2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00426-020-01415-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

“Walk this way”: specific contributions of active walking to the encoding of metric properties during spatial learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
4
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, in a triangle completion task in which the participant travels two outbound path legs before pointing back to the path origin, performance suffers when translation (change in position) is accomplished by teleportation compared to walking and suffers further when rotation (change in orientation) is accomplished by teleportation compared to real body rotation (Cherep, Lim, Kelly, Acharya, et al, 2020;Kelly et al, 2020). These findings are consistent with prior research indicating the importance of walking (Lhuillier et al, 2020), translational (Ruddle & Lessels, 2006) and rotational (Klatzky et al, 1998) self-motion cues to spatial updating. The goal of the current project was to characterize individual differences in spatial updating performance when teleporting.…”
Section: Individual Differences In Teleporting Through Virtual Envirosupporting
confidence: 82%
“…For example, in a triangle completion task in which the participant travels two outbound path legs before pointing back to the path origin, performance suffers when translation (change in position) is accomplished by teleportation compared to walking and suffers further when rotation (change in orientation) is accomplished by teleportation compared to real body rotation (Cherep, Lim, Kelly, Acharya, et al, 2020;Kelly et al, 2020). These findings are consistent with prior research indicating the importance of walking (Lhuillier et al, 2020), translational (Ruddle & Lessels, 2006) and rotational (Klatzky et al, 1998) self-motion cues to spatial updating. The goal of the current project was to characterize individual differences in spatial updating performance when teleporting.…”
Section: Individual Differences In Teleporting Through Virtual Envirosupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Numerous studies have investigated the effect of active walking locomotion during spatial learning (see Chrastil & Warren, 2012, for a review), and found that idiothetic information contributes to the acquisition of metric knowledge (Grant & Magee, 1998; Waller et al, 2004), with the translational component of physical walking being more beneficial to direction and distance estimation performance than the rotational vestibular component (Ruddle & Lessels, 2009; Ruddle, Volkova, & Bülthoff, 2011). These results corroborate the idea that body-related information extracted from physical walking contributes to the construction of spatial representations during navigation, notably with regard to the integration of metric properties linked with distances (see also Lhuillier et al, 2020). However, as stated by Tversky (1993), different memories or judgements about space are systematically distorted and potentially contradictory.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The main consequence of the present findings is that even though visual and proprioceptive information seem to be jointly integrated during spatial perception (Montello, 1997, 2009), the encoding of metric properties in memory does not seem to require a perfect redundancy between the magnitude of walking effort and the magnitude of travelled distances. In addition to the fact that metric properties can be accurately encoded in spatial representations even when optic flow speed does not perfectly match with walking speed (Lhuillier et al, 2020), we suggest here that recalibration processes can also compensate for the transgression of the relation between visual perception of slanted routes and energy expenditure associated with walking. At least, it is safe to say from these results that non-perfect redundancy between visual and sensorimotor information during spatial navigation does not contribute to major distortions in the encoding of metric properties.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nevertheless, this does not exclude that body-based cues play an important role in forming and recalling maps of the space when the body is used for navigation [1,28]. Indeed, embodied cognition researchers showed that the sensorimotor system helps to encode spatial frames, influence the accuracy of spatial map formation, and prepare the body to respond to meaningful stimuli in the surroundings [29][30][31].…”
Section: Towards An Embodied Space Approach In Spatial Neurorehabilitationmentioning
confidence: 99%