1985
DOI: 10.1109/tns.1985.4333970
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wake Potentials of a Relativistic Point Charge Crossing a Beam-Pipe Gap: An Analytical Approximation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…-The impedance falls off as k-1/2 in agreement with the results of Lawson [80,811 and Dome [24]. For a short Gaussian bunch, for which c << a, this high-frequency'-' tail of the impedance gives the main contribution to the energy loss for a cavity: The longitudinal loss factor as a function of the rms bunch length; -a = 3.5 cm, b = 5.5 cm, g = 2.5 cm.…”
Section: Loss Factors In the Diffraction Modelsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…-The impedance falls off as k-1/2 in agreement with the results of Lawson [80,811 and Dome [24]. For a short Gaussian bunch, for which c << a, this high-frequency'-' tail of the impedance gives the main contribution to the energy loss for a cavity: The longitudinal loss factor as a function of the rms bunch length; -a = 3.5 cm, b = 5.5 cm, g = 2.5 cm.…”
Section: Loss Factors In the Diffraction Modelsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The concept of narrow-band impedance presumes that the openings are small compared to the cavity surface. In this case, the field pattern inside the cavity is expected to be perturbed only slightly by the presence of the side tubes, and to be similar to that of the closed cavity [24]. Therefore, in the vicinity of the eigenfrequencies of the unperturbed cavity for which is shown here (solid line).…”
Section: --D a Perturbation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…where N is the truncation order, namely the number of terms retained in expansion (7), c (N) is the coefficients vector corresponding to that truncation error, and the standard Euclidean norm in ℓ 2 is employed. The error is plotted in Figures 3-7 for different geometries.…”
Section: Infinite Array Of Ringsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was considered for the first time likely by Bobrinev and Braginskii [1] in 1958 for non-relativistic particles and in 1959 by Dnestrovskii and Kostomarov for the ultra-relativistic case [2]. Since then, many other articles have dealt with the diffraction by axially symmetric structures [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13] as well as perfectly conducting semi-planes [14,15] and wedges [16,17]. In particular, in [10] a paradox rose when calculating the wake potential, which happened to be a not-causal function in the ultra-relativistic case.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The above formulas can be used to analytically calculate the wake potentials in right-cylinder structures in which the electromagnetic fields can be expressed in a closed form, such as pillbox resonators [18] and disk-loaded waveguide structures [19,20] with excitation by a point charge [21] or charged rings [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%