1992
DOI: 10.1063/1.41997
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coupling impedance for modern accelerators

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
(39 reference statements)
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The inequality W ð1Þ > W ð2Þ can be satisfied, for example, owing to differences in the permittivities or permeabilities [1,5]. In the case of vacuum structure (where ε 1 ¼ ε 2 ¼ μ 1 ¼ μ 2 ¼ 1), this inequality can be satisfied due to the difference in the conductive surfaces surrounding the charge trajectory, because these surfaces influence the electromagnetic field [2][3][4]. Naturally, for the case of relativistic motion, the radiation losses partially prevent self-acceleration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The inequality W ð1Þ > W ð2Þ can be satisfied, for example, owing to differences in the permittivities or permeabilities [1,5]. In the case of vacuum structure (where ε 1 ¼ ε 2 ¼ μ 1 ¼ μ 2 ¼ 1), this inequality can be satisfied due to the difference in the conductive surfaces surrounding the charge trajectory, because these surfaces influence the electromagnetic field [2][3][4]. Naturally, for the case of relativistic motion, the radiation losses partially prevent self-acceleration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…At the same time, self-fields can accelerate particles [1][2][3][4][5]. Such an effect cannot be realized if the charge environment at the end of the trajectory part under consideration is the same as the one at the beginning of the trajectory part.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, the condition of periodicity in terms of synchronism can be easily reformulated as N c >2N f . The same relationship was formulated, in fact, by S. Kheifits [4] for conventional circular structures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…, see [5,6]) we apply an extended formulation of the Sessler-Vainshtein approach [4]. The optical cavity modal loss factor α s corresponds to a single pass of the diffracted wave excited by the incident ('image') field.…”
Section: Extended Diffraction Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%