2009
DOI: 10.1080/14682740903162300
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Waiting for Dimona: The United States and Israel's development of nuclear capability

Abstract: The article analyzes the American Government's approach to Israel's development of nuclear capability during the end of Eisenhower's second term. It reviews, in particular, the December 1960 diplomatic crisis between the US and Israel, and points out how during the peak of the crisis the outgoing administration reported to the Israeli Government serious concern regarding the possibility of a pre-emptive attack by the Arab States motivated by intelligence and press leaks on Israel's nuclear programme. According… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 18 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On Brazil, see(Palmer and Milhollin 2004). An updated and comprehensive overview is offered in(Feldman 2010).25 A major "black hole" is the development of nuclear technology and armaments in Israel, which without doubt was strongly supported by foreign collaboration, but still presents deep unclarified aspects(Cohen 1998;Gerlini 2010).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On Brazil, see(Palmer and Milhollin 2004). An updated and comprehensive overview is offered in(Feldman 2010).25 A major "black hole" is the development of nuclear technology and armaments in Israel, which without doubt was strongly supported by foreign collaboration, but still presents deep unclarified aspects(Cohen 1998;Gerlini 2010).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%