1996
DOI: 10.1016/0014-2921(96)00009-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wages, profits and the international portfolio puzzle

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
133
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 135 publications
(142 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
8
133
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Using this, and 2 (n) = 1 1 (n), the average portfolio home bias across the two countries becomes simply 8 home bias = 0:…”
Section: Trade In Equitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using this, and 2 (n) = 1 1 (n), the average portfolio home bias across the two countries becomes simply 8 home bias = 0:…”
Section: Trade In Equitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 We follow the standard approach of constructing 5-year period averages so as to minimize business cycle effects and the well-known procyclicality of profits and wages (see Bottazzi et al, 1996). 12…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In part this home bias may reflect that (small) investors are less well informed about foreign than about domestic investment opportunities (see Gordon and Bovenberg (1996) and Westerhout (2002)). It may also reflect that returns on domestic equity tend to be negatively correlated with domestic wage rates, giving domestic workers a hedging motive to invest in domestic rather than foreign shares, as argued by Bottazzi et al (1996).…”
Section: Can Taxes On Saving Be Enforced?mentioning
confidence: 99%