2007
DOI: 10.1093/cesifo/ifm010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can Capital Income Taxes Survive? And Should They?

Abstract: Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
64
0
4

Year Published

2008
2008
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 111 publications
0
64
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…A substantial body of research has put forward explanations for this apparent paradox. First, the broadening of the corporate tax base by changes in the laws has played an important role in offsetting the reduction of statutory tax rates Simmons, 2006;Sorensen, 2006;Piotrowska and Vanborren, 2008). Second, income shifting from per sonal to corporate tax bases, or from non-corporate to the corporate sector due to the incentive effect of the low tax rate in the corporate sector has been suggested as another explanation for the paradox (Devereux and Sorensen, 2005;De Mooij and Nicodeme, 2008).…”
Section: Figure 21 a Verage Annual Direct To Indirect Tax Ratio" 19mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A substantial body of research has put forward explanations for this apparent paradox. First, the broadening of the corporate tax base by changes in the laws has played an important role in offsetting the reduction of statutory tax rates Simmons, 2006;Sorensen, 2006;Piotrowska and Vanborren, 2008). Second, income shifting from per sonal to corporate tax bases, or from non-corporate to the corporate sector due to the incentive effect of the low tax rate in the corporate sector has been suggested as another explanation for the paradox (Devereux and Sorensen, 2005;De Mooij and Nicodeme, 2008).…”
Section: Figure 21 a Verage Annual Direct To Indirect Tax Ratio" 19mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the distinction between statutory/average effective tax rates and effective marginal tax rates, which is not an issue in the basic model, becomes very important in this context, as the level of taxation of economic rents is largely determined by the statutory tax rate. Thus, one would also expect tax competition in statutory tax rates as countries attempt to attract highly mobile capital that generates firm-specific economic rents, tempered by the desire to tax location-specific rents, especially if a significant fraction of such rents accrue to foreigners (Devereux and Hubbard, 2003;Huizinga and Neilsen, 1997;Sorensen, 2006). Note that this reasoning suggests that tax competition will be more severe for small economies with little potential for location-specific economic rents.…”
Section: A Theoretical Models Of Tax Competitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is an old and widely acknowledged notion in the economics of taxation. Sørensen (2007) and Zodrow (2010) provide comprehensive surveys. The consequence of this idea is that countries compete over capital.…”
Section: What Is the Role Of Tax Havens In Theory?mentioning
confidence: 99%