2018
DOI: 10.3391/bir.2018.7.3.17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Waarnemingen.be – Non-native plant and animal occurrences in Flanders and the Brussels Capital Region, Belgium

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, a low number of projects, e.g., in the Netherlands and Belgium, may be explained by the presence of single, dominant national biodiversity portals not being included in our survey. For example, in Belgium, biodiversity recording is dominated by the general reporting portal www.waarnemingen.be which has a dedicated app and upon which early warning tools for IAS are built (Vanderhoeven et al 2015;Swinnen et al 2018). Additionally, there is a possible language bias, if projects from non-English speaking countries were not reached or not motivated to participate in the survey, which was only available in English.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, a low number of projects, e.g., in the Netherlands and Belgium, may be explained by the presence of single, dominant national biodiversity portals not being included in our survey. For example, in Belgium, biodiversity recording is dominated by the general reporting portal www.waarnemingen.be which has a dedicated app and upon which early warning tools for IAS are built (Vanderhoeven et al 2015;Swinnen et al 2018). Additionally, there is a possible language bias, if projects from non-English speaking countries were not reached or not motivated to participate in the survey, which was only available in English.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The positive impact of using approved observations for birds, and especially for species with a restricted range size, can be linked to the mechanism of record verification in the database (Swinnen et al, 2018), whereby records that can be verified by photograph or sound play an important role. The verification procedure consists of two main steps: (1) automated record validation by either image recognition or both spatial and temporal proximity of new records to existing approved records and (2) manual expert verification (when there is uncertainty in step 1).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Potential seasonal changes in habitat occupancy or range size were not considered. The selection excluded records verified as incorrect by species experts or the data platform's auto-validation system (Swinnen et al, 2018) and records from non-native or nonbreeding birds in Flanders (Vermeersch et al, 2020). Opportunistic presence-only data were used for model training, also excluding absences (zero-counts), and semi-structured data for model testing (Van Eupen et al, 2021).…”
Section: Species Data and Impact Of Quality Filteringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since 2008, after the launch of the online reporting portal 3 and its mobile phone applications by the conservation NGO Natuurpunt (cf. Swinnen et al, 2018), paper recording was replaced by online recording which greatly increased the number of ladybird observations, the speed of record submission, the number of volunteers as well as the spatial resolution and quality of ladybird records. As this platform is well established for recording, the European Ladybird App is anticipated to be used less used in Belgium by the established naturalist community, though it might still appeal to people wanting to increase their ladybird identification skills, wanting to contribute to European ladybird mapping specifically, as well as to a crowd outside the classical recording community.…”
Section: Belgiummentioning
confidence: 99%