1998
DOI: 10.1023/a:1008866717990
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, Z-Y demonstrated a greater overall adsorption for both m -cresol and phenol when compared to that of mordenite (Figure a,b). These results are consistent with prior reports and are likely due to the 3D pore structure of Z-Y as opposed to the 2D structure found in mordenite . Z-Y did not absorb insulin, as demonstrated from HPLC analysis following Z-Y passage (97.8% ± 0.6) (Figure c) while providing minimal removal of zinc (Figure S1).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…However, Z-Y demonstrated a greater overall adsorption for both m -cresol and phenol when compared to that of mordenite (Figure a,b). These results are consistent with prior reports and are likely due to the 3D pore structure of Z-Y as opposed to the 2D structure found in mordenite . Z-Y did not absorb insulin, as demonstrated from HPLC analysis following Z-Y passage (97.8% ± 0.6) (Figure c) while providing minimal removal of zinc (Figure S1).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The two types of zeolites evaluated were Z-Y and Mordenite. While both are aluminosilicates, they have their own unique properties . Each type of aluminosilicate is capable of binding both phenol and m -cresol (Figure ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations