2000
DOI: 10.1023/a:1023467806268
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Abstract: Event-related potentials (ERPs) during a visual oddball paradigm with button-pressing responses were recorded in 12 right-handed subjects from 32 scalp electrodes. The single equivalent current dipole (ECD) of the target C1 (weak occipito-parietal negativity from 30-80 ms) was consistently located at the primary visual cortex. From the 4-ECD localization of the target P1/N1 (temporally coincident frontal positivity and occipito-temporal negativity), it was suggested that this complex reflected activities from … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to sources in PFC (e.g., ACC), these studies have also identified sources of the reward-modulated P300 in the posterior cingulate cortex (Kamarajan et al, 2010; Zhou, Yu, & Zhou, 2010). In addition, the nonreward-modulated P300, elicited by a range of task demands, has been localized to PFC, including ACC, OFC, VLPFC, and the middle and inferior frontal gyri (Volpe et al, 2007; Neuhaus et al, 2006; Mulert et al, 2004; Yamazaki et al, 2000; Halgren, Marinkovic, & Chauvel, 1998), the inferior temporal gyrus (Bledowski et al, 2004), the parietal lobe (Moores et al, 2003), and the TPJ (Mulert et al, 2004). Therefore, it is likely that the structural integrity of PFC may contribute directly but also indirectly, via PFC interactions with more posterior brain regions, to adaptive modulation of the P300 response to both reward and nonreward contingencies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to sources in PFC (e.g., ACC), these studies have also identified sources of the reward-modulated P300 in the posterior cingulate cortex (Kamarajan et al, 2010; Zhou, Yu, & Zhou, 2010). In addition, the nonreward-modulated P300, elicited by a range of task demands, has been localized to PFC, including ACC, OFC, VLPFC, and the middle and inferior frontal gyri (Volpe et al, 2007; Neuhaus et al, 2006; Mulert et al, 2004; Yamazaki et al, 2000; Halgren, Marinkovic, & Chauvel, 1998), the inferior temporal gyrus (Bledowski et al, 2004), the parietal lobe (Moores et al, 2003), and the TPJ (Mulert et al, 2004). Therefore, it is likely that the structural integrity of PFC may contribute directly but also indirectly, via PFC interactions with more posterior brain regions, to adaptive modulation of the P300 response to both reward and nonreward contingencies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…P100 is closely related to selective attention and the consumption of attention resources [16] while N100 is said to reflect attention orientation and/or early engagement [17]; people with ASD may require more attention resources in processing novelty and can display low selectivity for distinct stimulus categories [18]. More specifically, lesions to the lateral extra-striate cortex within this group are associated with abnormal early ERPs vis a vis occipital-parietal areas [19,20]. Such deficits may illustrate comparatively lower consumption of attention resources, low selectivity between stimulus classes, and impairments in early orienting of attention to newly appearing visual stimuli.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given that groups with ASD and TD groups do not generally show significant differences in the P3b component [29,30], impairments within the former group may not reflect sustained attention. Instead, group differences in P100 and N100 [1820] suggest that problems related to ASD are more prominent in relation to initial orienting of attention that may be compensated for later stages involving sustained attention, at least when attention performance is comparable between children with ASD and TD children.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As it was mentioned above, the exogenous ERPs reflect early-stage, modality-specific, while endogenous ones reflect modality non-specific associative higher order processing of stimuli within the context of the task (Näätänen et al, 1978; Luck et al, 1990; Coles and Rugg, 1995; Hillyard and Annlo-Vento, 1998). Posterior visual P100 are generated within the fusiform gyrus with contribution from parieto-occipital and occipital cortices (Yamazaki et al, 2000). Frontal N100 ERP wave occurs within a similar time window and probably originates from more anterior frontal dipole generators (Clark et al, 1994).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%