2012
DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_00166
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural Integrity of the Prefrontal Cortex Modulates Electrocortical Sensitivity to Reward

Abstract: The P300 is a known ERP component assessing stimulus value, including the value of a monetary reward. In parallel, the incentive value of reinforcers relies on the PFC, a major cortical projection region of the mesocortical reward pathway. Here we show a significant positive correlation between P300 response to money (vs. no money) with PFC gray matter volume in the OFC, ACC, and dorsolateral and ventrolateral PFC in healthy control participants. In contrast, individuals with cocaine use disorders showed compr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
13
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
2
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the neural activity required for the successful preparation (here, encoding) of an upcoming event seems to be enhanced by the motivation to gain reward. This modulation of the P3b by reward expectancy is in line with results from other studies showing larger P3b amplitudes for reward trials than for trials without reward (Begleiter, Chou, & Aunon, 1983;Krebs et al, 2013;Parvaz, Konova, Tomasi, Volkow, & Goldstein, 2012), as well as for high-as compared to lowreward conditions (Capa, Bouquet, Dreher, & Dufur, 2013;Goldstein et al, 2006). Recently, Krebs and colleagues applied a Stroop task and found increased P3b amplitudes to reward-predicting cues, which were interpreted as increased preparatory attention toward critical features of the upcoming Stroop stimulus that were essential to obtain later reward.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Thus, the neural activity required for the successful preparation (here, encoding) of an upcoming event seems to be enhanced by the motivation to gain reward. This modulation of the P3b by reward expectancy is in line with results from other studies showing larger P3b amplitudes for reward trials than for trials without reward (Begleiter, Chou, & Aunon, 1983;Krebs et al, 2013;Parvaz, Konova, Tomasi, Volkow, & Goldstein, 2012), as well as for high-as compared to lowreward conditions (Capa, Bouquet, Dreher, & Dufur, 2013;Goldstein et al, 2006). Recently, Krebs and colleagues applied a Stroop task and found increased P3b amplitudes to reward-predicting cues, which were interpreted as increased preparatory attention toward critical features of the upcoming Stroop stimulus that were essential to obtain later reward.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Recent studies of GMV in cocaine-dependent adults (5961) have found lower gray matter relative to controls in ventral-frontal regions that overlap the ventral-frontal cluster reported here. Lower OFC GMV was correlated with cocaine-related compulsivity in Ersche and colleagues, whereas Konova and colleagues (60) found not only lower GMV in the VMPFC in cocaine-dependent subjects, but also greater VMPFC deactivation in a monetary reward task relative to control subjects.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…Nonetheless, these results were not replicated using an alternative meta-analytic method (see Liu et al 2011). Such scarce evidence contrasts with the psychophysiological studies showing enhanced P300 when processing reward cues and outcomes (Parvaz et al 2012;van Lankveld and Smulders 2008;Yeung and Sanfey 2004), and with functional connectivity studies showing increased coupling between the parietal and striatal areas in the presence of reward cues (Padmala and Pessoa 2011). Furthermore, fMRI studies using attentional paradigms have revealed the greater involvement of the fronto-parietal areas when processing rewarding stimuli that compete with other stimuli (Small et al 2005;Locke and Braver 2008;Mohanty et al 2008;Engelmann et al 2009;Ivanov et al 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%