1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0167-9317(97)00116-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

W/TiN double layers as barrier system for use in Cu metallization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The higher barrier breakdown temperature of bilayer films compared to that of the corresponding single-layer structure has been primarily attributed to the grain boundary mismatch between the two layers. 19,20 Leu et al 21 reported Ir͑5 nm͒/TaN͑5 nm͒ bilayer barrier to be effective for blocking copper diffusion up to 600°C. The breakdown temperature of Ta/TaN 22 bilayer structure was reported to be as high as 900°C, whereas Ru/ TaN 23 and Mo/W-N 20 barrier structures were stable at least up to 900 and 775°C, respectively.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The higher barrier breakdown temperature of bilayer films compared to that of the corresponding single-layer structure has been primarily attributed to the grain boundary mismatch between the two layers. 19,20 Leu et al 21 reported Ir͑5 nm͒/TaN͑5 nm͒ bilayer barrier to be effective for blocking copper diffusion up to 600°C. The breakdown temperature of Ta/TaN 22 bilayer structure was reported to be as high as 900°C, whereas Ru/ TaN 23 and Mo/W-N 20 barrier structures were stable at least up to 900 and 775°C, respectively.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The higher thermal stability of a Ta(20 nm)/TaN(10 nm) stacked layer than that of the single layer Ta (30 nm) or TaN (30 nm) was attributed to the grain boundary mismatches between Ta and TaN. A W(20 nm)/TiN(20 nm) layer offered superior thermal stability to that of W or TiN single layer barrier films [12]. Tan et al [13] reported an insignificant increase in sheet resistance of Ru(10 nm)/TaN(10 nm) double layer barrier structures after annealing up to 900 • C, whereas the failure temperature of a single layer Ru was only 600 • C. Although these bilayer barrier nanostructures exhibited better thermal stability than that of their corresponding single layer structures, the total barrier thickness were large enough to meet the present requirements of such barrier films [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%