2011
DOI: 10.1007/978-0-85729-655-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vulnerable Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
148
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 169 publications
(148 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
148
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently, the ontology on vulnerable systems shown in Fig. 3 explicitly refers to four classes of vulnerable systems: (1) ''natural systems'' for vulnerability studies referring to a set of subclasses that include physical systems (Calvalieri et al 2012), biological systems (De Lange et al 2010), and/or biophysical systems (O'Brien et al 2004); (2) ''social systems'' for vulnerability studies referring to the subclasses of population in general (Adger 1999;Carreño et al 2007), social groups, for example, communities (Cutter et al 2003;Bollin and Hidajat 2006), functional systems, such as the economy (Patt et al 2010), the public financial sector (Mechler et al 2006) or the health sector (Hahn et al 2009;Few and Tran 2010); and (3) ''technical systems,'' such as vulnerability studies referring to critical infrastructure (Hellström 2007;Kröger and Zio 2011). In addition, the ontology also accounts for a separate class of hybrid concepts referring to interactions between and within systems, such as in societal and ecological (biophysical) subsystems (Turner et al 2003;Gallopín 2006) or societal and technical subsystems (Khazai et al 2013).…”
Section: Vulnerable Systems-vulnerability Of What?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, the ontology on vulnerable systems shown in Fig. 3 explicitly refers to four classes of vulnerable systems: (1) ''natural systems'' for vulnerability studies referring to a set of subclasses that include physical systems (Calvalieri et al 2012), biological systems (De Lange et al 2010), and/or biophysical systems (O'Brien et al 2004); (2) ''social systems'' for vulnerability studies referring to the subclasses of population in general (Adger 1999;Carreño et al 2007), social groups, for example, communities (Cutter et al 2003;Bollin and Hidajat 2006), functional systems, such as the economy (Patt et al 2010), the public financial sector (Mechler et al 2006) or the health sector (Hahn et al 2009;Few and Tran 2010); and (3) ''technical systems,'' such as vulnerability studies referring to critical infrastructure (Hellström 2007;Kröger and Zio 2011). In addition, the ontology also accounts for a separate class of hybrid concepts referring to interactions between and within systems, such as in societal and ecological (biophysical) subsystems (Turner et al 2003;Gallopín 2006) or societal and technical subsystems (Khazai et al 2013).…”
Section: Vulnerable Systems-vulnerability Of What?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, unexpected events occurring in critical infrastructures, such as power distribution networks, can propagate their disrupting consequences to other connected systems and lead to cascading effects with huge economical and safety impacts (Kröger & Zio, 2011;Vaiman et al, 2012;Zio, 2016a). However, such consequences can be strongly mitigated if those events are -to some extent -known in advance (PateCornell, 2002;Paté-Cornell, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A good estimation of the type of failure requires a good estimation of how the failure of part of the network can spread, which is something that is dependent on the network topology and requires appropriate consideration of * hackl@ibi.baug.ethz.ch the mutual interplay between the structural complexity and functional dynamics of the network [4]. The estimation of the type of network failure is usually made using the exact network topology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%