2014
DOI: 10.1093/forestry/cpu008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vulnerability of uneven-aged forests to storm damage

Abstract: Uneven-aged forests are assumed to have a high stability against storm damage but have rarely been analysed for vulnerability to storm damage due to a lack of a sufficient empirical database. Here we model storm damage in uneven-aged forest to analyse major factors that may determine the sensitivity of this type of forests to storms based on a broad database. Data are derived of public forests in the canton Neuchâ tel in West Switzerland that are dominated by silver fir and Norway spruce and managed since the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
51
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
3
51
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Results from many studies in Europe indicate that mixed uneven-aged forests are more resistant to disturbance and may sooner return to their original state than monospecific even-aged forests [1,61,[64][65][66]. There are several tree and stand characteristics in a structurally complex arrangement that improve their resistance to disturbance in comparison with even-aged forests.…”
Section: Stand Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results from many studies in Europe indicate that mixed uneven-aged forests are more resistant to disturbance and may sooner return to their original state than monospecific even-aged forests [1,61,[64][65][66]. There are several tree and stand characteristics in a structurally complex arrangement that improve their resistance to disturbance in comparison with even-aged forests.…”
Section: Stand Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, it was climate related damage to stands managed by uniform silvicultural systems that advanced the use of irregular forestry in the 19 th century as a result of the failure of the uniform system subject to storms [53]. Irregular stand structures appear to be more resilient to abiotic damage than even-aged stands and lower damage levels have been observed in irregular stands following storms in comparison with regular even-aged stands [54]. Dominant trees in irregular stands emerge earlier and develop deeper canopies than dominants in regular stands and, as a consequence, are exposed to bigger wind loads due to the greater crown size and over a longer period of time resulting in the development of stabilising features such as greater stem taper and stronger structural roots [55].…”
Section: Developing Irregular Stand Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mason [55] concluded that fully developed irregular stands in a 'balanced' condition would appear to be more resilient to wind damage than regular stands where exposure in moderate, but the difference is likely to be minimal where exposure is severe. Even where the balanced irregular condition exists, harvesting interventions have been found to cause a destabilising effect for a number of years [54]. However, where damage does occur in heterogeneous stands, much of the advanced regeneration will remain limiting the loss of forest cover.…”
Section: Developing Irregular Stand Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, lower tree height-to-diameter ratios (H:D) may enhance windfirmness [13] in uneven-aged stands compared to even-aged stands, while partial harvestings, which may increase wind load [14] by leaving spaces between crowns, are repeatedly performed throughout the rotation in uneven-aged silviculture but are only optionally performed in even-aged silviculture. Moreover, comparing even-and uneven-aged silviculture is challenging, as some of the factors that would affect stand windthrow susceptibility may vary through time, especially across even-aged stand development [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%