2004
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4020-2552-5_16
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vulnerability in Research Subjects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
81
0
4

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
81
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Levine et al (2004) accept Kipnis's (2001) definition of vulnerability as articulated in his NBAC-commissioned paper, "Vulnerability in research subjects: A bioethical taxonomy," as an adequate and accurate account of how vulnerability is understood and applied by researchers and institutional review boards (IRBs). In his paper, Kipnis argues that vulnerability (in human subjects research) should be understood as that which "call[s] into question the efficacy of consent in effecting permissibility" (Kipnis 2001).…”
Section: Contextualizing the Vulnerability Standardmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Levine et al (2004) accept Kipnis's (2001) definition of vulnerability as articulated in his NBAC-commissioned paper, "Vulnerability in research subjects: A bioethical taxonomy," as an adequate and accurate account of how vulnerability is understood and applied by researchers and institutional review boards (IRBs). In his paper, Kipnis argues that vulnerability (in human subjects research) should be understood as that which "call[s] into question the efficacy of consent in effecting permissibility" (Kipnis 2001).…”
Section: Contextualizing the Vulnerability Standardmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, it has been argued that the concept of vulnerability remains vague 3 and even that the ''definition of vulnerability for the purposes of healthcare and research with human participants is . .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…fetuses and children is partly understood as a diminished capacity to consent to participate in research (Kipnis 2001;Zion, Gillam and Loff 2000: 616). Prisoners are seen as potentially coerced through the structural conditions of imprisonment.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%