2011
DOI: 10.1177/1077801211436169
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gendered Violence and the Ethics of Social Science Research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(40 reference statements)
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This selection would avoid wasting resources with people who are not yet ready to desist (and will not benefit from employment) and avoid creating perverse incentives for those who are still actively involved in crime. Until women's risks are properly defined and assessed, the development of programming that best suits their needs will continue to fall short [53,54,84,114,129]. Most importantly, we must infuse all programming with an intersectional orientation that accounts for the many victimization, offending, and reentry contexts that women of different races, classes, sexual orientations, and other social loci must navigate [37,41,89,96].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This selection would avoid wasting resources with people who are not yet ready to desist (and will not benefit from employment) and avoid creating perverse incentives for those who are still actively involved in crime. Until women's risks are properly defined and assessed, the development of programming that best suits their needs will continue to fall short [53,54,84,114,129]. Most importantly, we must infuse all programming with an intersectional orientation that accounts for the many victimization, offending, and reentry contexts that women of different races, classes, sexual orientations, and other social loci must navigate [37,41,89,96].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scholars have criticized IRB overreach and the limitations set on social research despite little evidence that IRBs are effective in protecting participants (Adler & Adler, 2016). IRB guidelines are focused on a rights-based model rather than on the ethics of care explicitly promoted by feminist researchers (Gilligan, 1982;Harding, 2004;Mulla & Hlavka, 2011). Concerned mainly with managing risk, the result is disparate ethical body conclusions for similarly proposed studies in different universities (Stark, 2012) and decreased attention to understudied groups and topics like child sexual victimization.…”
Section: Sexual Violence Voice and Regulating Bodiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers can promote examples of studies with similar topics and methods (Adler & Adler, 2016) and inform IRBs about nontraditional designs outside of more traditional paradigms (Harger & Quintela, 2017). Scholars must question the role of regulatory bodies and feminist critiques ought to figure predominately in discussions of ethics, focusing less on universal rights and rules and more on care ethics, interpersonal relations and positionality, and researcher responsibilities (Mulla & Hlavka, 2011).…”
Section: Sexual Violence Voice and Regulating Bodiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, I have considerable experience dealing with issues of violence and psychological trauma, and ethical practice and care in research, so as to be able to provide fi rst response to any interlocutors who may be in need (Igreja 2004(Igreja , 2009Igreja et al 2004). Although none of them showed signs of distress when telling me of their experiences, I took into account the feminist perspective that recommends that researchers 'consider victims of violence as moral agents' (Mulla andHlavka 2011: 1512). In this regard, and in a fashion similar to how Sharon Lamb (1999: 9) considers how 'victims struggle to remain agents of their acts as they describe their victimization', I understood that my interlocutors told me of their experiences of exposure to violence not to claim victimhood and vulnerability but to demonstrate that they could speak with authority on the topic of DV.…”
Section: Hanging Around In Public Spaces and Conducting Interviewsmentioning
confidence: 99%