2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.accre.2017.11.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vulnerability assessment: A comparison of three different city sizes in the coastal area of Central Java, Indonesia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
32
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The increasing occurrence of climate disasters can be attributed to sea level rise [10,50]. A similar phenomenon was found in the coastal area of Java [20,28]. As shown in Figures 6 and 7, flood events in 2010 were mostly in areas with population growth less than 1%, both in rural and urban areas in the coastal region of Central Java.…”
Section: Urbanization and Climate-related Disasterssupporting
confidence: 59%
“…The increasing occurrence of climate disasters can be attributed to sea level rise [10,50]. A similar phenomenon was found in the coastal area of Java [20,28]. As shown in Figures 6 and 7, flood events in 2010 were mostly in areas with population growth less than 1%, both in rural and urban areas in the coastal region of Central Java.…”
Section: Urbanization and Climate-related Disasterssupporting
confidence: 59%
“…Moreover, distance to urban markets and metaled roads influence the livelihood security of rural households [139]. Studies on the vulnerability of city sizes suggested that larger cities are less vulnerable to hazards compared to small cities as they have more social, economic, physical, and institutional resources to deal with hazards [15,[140][141][142]. In terms of rural households' distance to cities, Maddison [143] argued that farmers living in close proximity to markets are more able to adapt to climate change in eleven African countries.…”
Section: Spatial Patternmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study agrees "that one only rarely encounters explicit (post)positivist principles, but we can ascertain the existence of a hidden frame of reference and an implicit epistemological position" [35] (p. 5). For instance, positivist and post-positivist paradigms commonly agree that the purpose of research (whether qualitative or quantitative in approach) include the testing of theories, prediction of outcomes, and determination of relationships between events, or variables or causes and effects [78][79][80][81][82][83][84], as shown in various research studies with mixed approaches [85][86][87][88][89]. The post-positivist perspective of this study has distinguished itself from positivist studies through its implied views that the quantification (particularly through the use of sophisticated statistical methods and mathematical models) do not necessarily "enable the attainment of scientifically relevant insights" [35] (p. 6).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%