Vulnerability analysis of desktop 3D printer software

Moore, Samuel; Armstrong, Phillip A.; McDonald, Todd; Yampolskiy, Mark

doi:10.1109/rweek.2016.7573305

Cited by 34 publications

(29 citation statements)

References 9 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Examples from the closely related AM security literature (we provide a more detailed description in Section 7) are also numerous. Considering attack vectors, researchers have complained about the lack of the security features associated with design files or design file transfer [21], identified that the employed software and firmware have numerous vulnerabilities [22], exploited weaknesses in the communication protocol to highjack the session [23], or used social engineering to convince a user to open a malicious e-mail attachment [2]. Compromised elements include computers that store design files and control the manufacturing process [2,6], communication networks that connect these computers with the robotized manufacturing equipment [23], the firmware installed on the equipment [24,25], or even an in-situ quality control system [26].…”

Section: Threat Model and Focus Of The Papermentioning

confidence: 99%

Optimal sabotage attack on composite material parts

Ranabhat

Clements

Gatlin

et al. 2019

International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Threat Model and Focus Of The Papermentioning

confidence: 99%

Optimal sabotage attack on composite material parts

Ranabhat

Clements

Gatlin

et al. 2019

International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Also, authors in [114] have proposed a reverse engineering methodology for validation of the printed objects that can also be utilized for integrity assurance of the system. Availability Besides the commonly known tools such as [115] designed to help improve the availability of webbased services, authors in [116] have suggested using six tools to evaluate vulnerabilities and demonstrated them with code from open source projects.…”

Section: Prototypingmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Secure route data Protocols against cloud security secure 3D printer [116] control [124,125] against DDoS on IoT [126] in cloud [119] DDoS on Cloud [109] against DDoS [109] of manufacturing systems using various IoT, CPS, etc. can only be secured if the underlying hardware is secured [145].…”

Section: Routing Protocolsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Manufacturing Supply Chain and Product Lifecycle Security in the Era of Industry 4.0

et al. 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The next generation of smart manufacturing systems will incorporate various recent enabling technologies. These technologies will aid in ushering the era of the fourth industrial revolution. They will make the supply chain and the product lifecycle of the manufacturing system efficient, decentralized, and well-connected. However, these technologies have various security issues and, when integrated in the supply chain and the product lifecycle of manufacturing systems, can pose various challenges for maintaining the security requirements such as confidentiality, integrity, and availability. In this paper, we will present the various trends and advances in the security of the supply chain and product lifecycle of the manufacturing system while highlighting the roles played by the major enabling components of Industry 4.0.

show abstract

“…Furthermore, communications protocols employed by desktop 3D printers can be exploited, enabling the retrieval of current and previously-printed 3D models, the termination of active printing jobs and the submission of unauthorized (new) jobs [13]. Software and firmware commonly used in desktop 3D printers contain numerous vulnerabilities [28]. A phishing attack can be used to install a backdoor that enables arbitrary, targeted manipulations of design files by a remote adversary [6].…”

Section: Additive Manufacturing Securitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluation of Additive and Subtractive Manufacturing From the Security Perspective

Yampolskiy

King

Pope

et al. 2017

Critical Infrastructure Protection XI

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Additive manufacturing involves a new class of cyber-physical systems that manufacture 3D objects incrementally by depositing and fusing together thin layers of source material. In 2015, the global additive manufacturing industry had°5.165 billion in revenue, with 32.5% of all manufactured objects used as functional parts. Because of their reliance on computerization, additive manufacturing devices (or 3D printers) are susceptible to a broad range of attacks. The rapid adoption of additive manufacturing in aerospace, automotive and other industries makes it an attractive attack target and a critical asset to be protected. This chapter compares emerging additive manufacturing and traditional subtractive manufacturing from the security perspective. While the discussion compares the two manufacturing technologies, the emphasis is on additive manufacturing due to its expected dominance as the manufacturing technology of the future. The chapter outlines the additive and subtractive manufacturing workflows, proposes a framework for analyzing attacks on or using additive manufacturing systems and presents the major threat categories. In order to compare the two manufacturing paradigms from the security perspective, the differences between the two workflows are identified and the attack analysis framework is applied to demonstrate how the differences translate into threats. The analysis reveals that, while there is significant overlap with regard to security, fundamental differences in the two manufacturing paradigms require a separate investigation of additive manufacturing security.

show abstract

Vulnerability analysis of desktop 3D printer software

Cited by 34 publications

References 9 publications

Optimal sabotage attack on composite material parts

Optimal sabotage attack on composite material parts

Manufacturing Supply Chain and Product Lifecycle Security in the Era of Industry 4.0

Evaluation of Additive and Subtractive Manufacturing From the Security Perspective

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About