2006
DOI: 10.1086/507853
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vox Populi: Resource Partitioning, Organizational Proliferation, and the Cultural Impact of the Insurgent Microradio Movement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
98
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 109 publications
(102 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
2
98
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, Carroll and Swaminathan (2000) highlight the oppositional code of "microbrewer"-one that excluded mass brewers and thereby protected the niche of the microbrewers (see also Swaminathan 2001;Greve, Pozner, and Rao 2006;Pozner and Rao 2006). Scotch-whisky production provides a compelling context to study the role of identity in resource partitioning.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, Carroll and Swaminathan (2000) highlight the oppositional code of "microbrewer"-one that excluded mass brewers and thereby protected the niche of the microbrewers (see also Swaminathan 2001;Greve, Pozner, and Rao 2006;Pozner and Rao 2006). Scotch-whisky production provides a compelling context to study the role of identity in resource partitioning.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Movements are inherently dynamic phenomena, unfolding in stages: they emerge, grow, and eventually decline. Resource partitioning theorists reason that social and identity movements enhance specialists' viability by increasing the dimensionality of the resource space and by creating resource pockets for specialists to exploit (e.g., Carroll & Swaminathan, 2000;Greve, Pozner, & Rao, 2006;Soule & King, 2008). In the micro-brewing and micro-radio cases, for example, strong identity movements are found to be important drivers of partitioning and are identified as successful triggers of specialist proliferation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We juxtapose the microbrew, micro-radio, and organic farming movements and seek to understand the similarities and differences between the three. We adopt a longitudinal view using "thick" qualitative data to reconstruct the organic farming movement as a historical case study, and engage in what Ragin (1994) termed "reciprocal clarification," using extant research on the micro-radio and micro-brew movements (Carroll & Swaminathan, 2000;Greve et al, 2006) to identify the key mechanisms that drive partitioning. We then compare and reconcile the similarities and differences between the mechanisms underlying previously studied movements and those underpinning the organic farming movement as it unfolded.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The emerging conversation between these approaches can be furthered and be taken beyond the selective appropriation of certain ideas and concepts from the ''production'' paradigm on the part of organizational scholars (e.g., Greve, Pozner, & Rao, 2006). In addition, we can begin to use the insights from field and production perspectives to inform the sophisticated framework for the analysis of social forms recently systematized by ecological theorists (e.g., Hannan et al, 2007).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%