2010
DOI: 10.2202/1944-2866.1027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Voting Advice Applications in Lithuania: Promoting Programmatic Competition or Breeding Populism?

Abstract: This article analyses the effects of the voting assistance tool Manobalsas that was developed for the Lithuanian parliamentary elections of 2008 by three leading universities in Lithuania. Analytical voting assistance tools (or Voting Advice Applications — VAAs) assist voters by offering systematised information about candidates and parties, and by providing voting recommendation based on the congruence of political attitudes between a voter and a party. Voting assistance tools were mainly developed by academi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is, in many respects, an innovative approach that has a lot of potential; however, as this article argues, we need to consider many methodologically controversial aspects of the estimation process in the context of VAAs. Nevertheless, failure to do so can result in a proliferation of unreliable and invalid data on party positions with potential consequences, not only to the accuracy of our inferences about how democracy works but also to the democratic process itself (see Walgrave et al, 2009;Ramonait . e, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is, in many respects, an innovative approach that has a lot of potential; however, as this article argues, we need to consider many methodologically controversial aspects of the estimation process in the context of VAAs. Nevertheless, failure to do so can result in a proliferation of unreliable and invalid data on party positions with potential consequences, not only to the accuracy of our inferences about how democracy works but also to the democratic process itself (see Walgrave et al, 2009;Ramonait . e, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are numerous applications developed for this purpose. The three leading universities in Lithuania developed the application Manobalsas for the purposes of Lithuanian parliamentary elections in 2008 (Ramonaite, 2010). However, there is a security issue since it is very important to adequately confirm voter's personal data, but without a possibility to trace the vote, in order to preserve voting secrecy.…”
Section: E-voting As An E-government Servicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Statistics has found that respondents were more aware of political differences after they solved the quiz, but also the quiz helped them to get more information than they had, and some of the respondents changed their minds as to for whom to vote (Vote Match Europe, 2014), (Vote Match UK, 2014). Research has shown that the use of VAAs can be useful in non-ideological populist parties that can adapt the preferences of an average voter (Ramonaite, 2010).…”
Section: E-voting As An E-government Servicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The historic development of these party systems explains these differences. Similarly, the differences between the political spaces in new democracies in the South of Europe as well as in Central and Eastern European countries have been explained by referring to country-specific historical and demographic factors (Evans and Whitefield, 1993;Evans and Whitefield, 1998;Kitschelt et al, 1999;Rohrschneider and Whitefield, 2009;Ramonaite, 2010). One should be cautious when integrating party positions from different European countries into one single model, because of these national differences.…”
Section: A Pan-european Party Spacementioning
confidence: 99%