2004
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2508.2004.00278.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vote-Seeking Incentives and Legislative Representation in Six Presidential Democracies

Abstract: Through the use of an original data set of bill initiation activity in six presidential democracies, we advance scholarly understanding of how the institutional incentives faced by legislative candidates influence representation. We extend and adapt theory, derived primarily from the experience of the U.S. Congress, demonstrating its viability, once assumed constants from the U.S. case are explicitly modeled, in quite distinct institutional contexts. In particular, we find the focus of individual legislators o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
184
0
19

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 210 publications
(205 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
184
0
19
Order By: Relevance
“…Party affiliations, interest groups, personal linkages and heterogeneity play a role apart from the electoral system. Crisp et al (2004) argue empirically with data of bill initiation activity in six presidential democracies that with centralized candidate selection and as district magnitude increases, members of parliament will less frequently initiate legislation aimed at a particular constituency and rather focus on the national party's interest. By analyzing voting results of two different amendments enacted by the Swiss parliament and surveys conducted amongst the legislators, Bailer et al (2008) find that deputies elected under proportional representation, i.e., from districts with a larger number of seats, act closer in accordance with their parties than deputies from small plurality or close to plurality districts.…”
Section: Literature Overviewmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Party affiliations, interest groups, personal linkages and heterogeneity play a role apart from the electoral system. Crisp et al (2004) argue empirically with data of bill initiation activity in six presidential democracies that with centralized candidate selection and as district magnitude increases, members of parliament will less frequently initiate legislation aimed at a particular constituency and rather focus on the national party's interest. By analyzing voting results of two different amendments enacted by the Swiss parliament and surveys conducted amongst the legislators, Bailer et al (2008) find that deputies elected under proportional representation, i.e., from districts with a larger number of seats, act closer in accordance with their parties than deputies from small plurality or close to plurality districts.…”
Section: Literature Overviewmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Broadly speaking, there are two types of benefits that voters desire from their representatives: particularistic goods and programmatic goods (Crisp et al, 2004;S. W. Desposato, 2006).…”
Section: Voter Demands Access To Resources and Party Switchingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…O resultado concreto pretende promover estabilidade de governo por meio da continuidade que vai além de indivíduos e determinar seqüências de responsabilização por atos governamentais. Boa parte da avaliação dos partidos como mecanismos de representação analisa as conseqüências de variação dessas normas (Carey, 2003;Crisp et al, 2004;Mainwaring;Scully, 1995). Ao longo do tempo e do espaço, tem variado bastante a capacidade de os partidos latino-americanos assegurarem tais funções governamentais (Mainwaring, 1999a(Mainwaring, , 2006.…”
Section: Representação Por Meio De Governo E Espaço Públicounclassified