Sprache, Diskurs Und Text 1983
DOI: 10.1515/9783111351254.28
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Voraussetzungen zu einer Untersuchung der semantischen Belastung von submorphematischen Einheiten im Englischen

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One less conventional subdomain of the semantics of syllable constituents is phonaesthetics (Zelinsky-Wibbelt 1983). Phonaesthetic onset clusters perhaps originate historically in explicit compounds and blends, and fit nicely into the concept of a semantic-pragmatic interpretation σphon of phonotactics.…”
Section: Flat Wordsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…One less conventional subdomain of the semantics of syllable constituents is phonaesthetics (Zelinsky-Wibbelt 1983). Phonaesthetic onset clusters perhaps originate historically in explicit compounds and blends, and fit nicely into the concept of a semantic-pragmatic interpretation σphon of phonotactics.…”
Section: Flat Wordsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In these words, slV-references a kind of 'slipperiness' because the words that contain this phoneme cluster are associated. Similar examples such as the onset tw-'twisting motion' of twitch, twist, twine, etc., or the final cluster -ack 'striking sound' as in clack, crack, flack, are legion 6 • Submorphemic units (Zelinsky-Wibbelt 1983;Wescott 1976) have also been referred to in the literature as root-forming morphemes (Bloomfield, L. 1933:244-6, Pike 1943:77 passim, Bloomfield, M. 1953 and phon(a)esthemes (Firth 1964, Householder 1946, Wescott 1976. Structuralist and generative analyses generally do not treat these units as morphemes due to their limited ability to combine with free forms (Nida 1949:61) or with forms that occur in other combinations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%