Stadtentwicklung in Ostdeutschland 1996
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-322-89071-9_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Von der Stadt im Sozialismus zur Stadt im Kapitalismus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another relevant factor was that even though East Germany had completely adopted the West German planning system during reunification in theory, planning regulations were not yet fully established in the early 1990s in practice. Effective regulations in the face of new developments often did not exist, especially not at the regional planning level (Aring and Herfert, 2001; Häußermann, 1996; Nuissl and Rink, 2005). 9 Planners in East Germany had to become familiar with the new system, institutions and plans had to be established, and municipalities had to deal with decentralised power and inter-municipal competition.…”
Section: Suburbanisation In East Germany After 1989mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another relevant factor was that even though East Germany had completely adopted the West German planning system during reunification in theory, planning regulations were not yet fully established in the early 1990s in practice. Effective regulations in the face of new developments often did not exist, especially not at the regional planning level (Aring and Herfert, 2001; Häußermann, 1996; Nuissl and Rink, 2005). 9 Planners in East Germany had to become familiar with the new system, institutions and plans had to be established, and municipalities had to deal with decentralised power and inter-municipal competition.…”
Section: Suburbanisation In East Germany After 1989mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since segregation in Czech cities is mainly at the level of houses or building clusters, micro-level analysis not only helps to detect seeds of poverty in neighbourhoods, but also shows how the risk processes operate in particular housing estates within a particular local context. post-socialist cities (Musil, 1993;Andrusz et al, 1996;Häußermann, 1996;Węcławowicz, 1996;Enyedi, 1998;Eckardt, 2006). Hand-inhand with socio-spatial change has come a great interest on the part of social sciences in the description and evaluation of new social and economic processes in urban settings (Musil and Illner, 1994;Kostinskiy, 2001;Musil, 2002;Tsenkova and Nedovic´-Budic´, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In the 1990s, many voices in the academic and public spheres warned against the social and physical degradation of housing estates in post-socialist cities (Szelényi, 1996;Enyedi, 1998). Although there are many problems facing large prefabricated housing estates today, it is not generally a case of the depopulation, abandonment and social degradation that can be found in, for example, many east German cities (Häußermann, 1996;Harth et al, 1998;Mäding, 2003;Glock and Häußermann, 2004). Housing estates in different countries and regions and in various locations in cities have experienced different development trajectories during the postsocialist transition and in some of them the risk of social and physical degradation has become more real.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%