2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.livsci.2008.07.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Voluntary intake and diet selection by dairy heifers fed ensiled whole-crop barley and oats harvested at different stages of maturity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In FDA, Karma showed results of 349 g/kg and was lower than the control (P<0.05), in other cultivars accumulation was greater at 395 g/kg. (30) mencionan que un incremento de FDN en el forraje afecta negativamente el consumo de la materia seca.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In FDA, Karma showed results of 349 g/kg and was lower than the control (P<0.05), in other cultivars accumulation was greater at 395 g/kg. (30) mencionan que un incremento de FDN en el forraje afecta negativamente el consumo de la materia seca.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rate of digestion (K^), lag time for digestion, soluble fraction (SF), potentially degradable (D) and undegradable (Undeg) proportions of DM, OM, CP, and NDF for whole-crop millet {Panicum milliaceum; cv. Red Proso) harvested at different stages of maturity, determined using in situ incubations (Acosta et al, 1991;Filya, 2003;Wallsten et al, 2009), which is not appropriate as a reference for dry-preserved forages. For example, in contrast to silage (Khorasani et al, 1997), postharvest preservation of forage in a swath grazing system exposes the harvested whole-plant material to environmental weather conditions, including precipitation, which decreases CP concentrations, increases NDF and ADF concentrations, and decreases in vitro OM digestibility (Aasen et al, 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in contrast to silage (Khorasani et al, 1997), postharvest preservation of forage in a swath grazing system exposes the harvested whole-plant material to environmental weather conditions, including precipitation, which decreases CP concentrations, increases NDF and ADF concentrations, and decreases in vitro OM digestibility (Aasen et al, 2004). The resulting recommendations for optimal maturity at harvest, which are largely from studies based on ensiling, have been to harvest barley, millet, oat, and wheat at the soft dough (Acosta et al, 1991;Khorasani et al, 1997;Wallsten et al, 2009), 3 wk post heading (May et al, 2007;McCartney et al, 2009), late milk (Kilcher and Troelsen, 1973;McCartney and Vaage, 1994;Wallsten et al, 2009), and early dough (Filya, 2003) stages, respectively. These recommendations aim to balance the general decline in apparent total tract OM and NDF digestibility with advancing maturity and capitalize on increases in yield (Kilcher and Troelsen, 1973;Acosta et al, 1991;Khorasani et al, 1997).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the long silage harvested at dough stage of maturity the grains were attached by long awns, which was generally not the case with grain in the chopped dough-stage silage. The long awns might have been unpleasant for the animals (Laca et al, 2001;Wallsten et al, 2009), which could have affected their intake negatively.…”
Section: Intakementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wallsten et al (2009) found that dairy heifers, fed round-baled whole-crop barley silage (WCBS) selected for the non-fibrous parts, when fed two-rowed but not when fed six-rowed barley harvested at the dough stage of maturity. They claimed that awns prevented the heifers from selecting kernels of the six-rowed barley which resulted in depressed intake.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%