2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2009.09.055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Voluntary and compulsory eradication of bovine viral diarrhoea virus in Lower Austria

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since some of these PI animals may be in utero at the time of the initial herd screen, such testing may be spread over an extended period, particularly where PI cattle are detected. This approach has been used successfully in Nordic countries and elsewhere in Europe (Synge and others 1999, Rossmanith and others 2010), although typically it has taken 10 years to reach the final stages of national eradication (Lindberg and others 2006). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since some of these PI animals may be in utero at the time of the initial herd screen, such testing may be spread over an extended period, particularly where PI cattle are detected. This approach has been used successfully in Nordic countries and elsewhere in Europe (Synge and others 1999, Rossmanith and others 2010), although typically it has taken 10 years to reach the final stages of national eradication (Lindberg and others 2006). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The program became compulsory in 2004 and extended to the entire country. In 2008 92% of all herds in Lower-Austria were certified as free from BVDV (Rossmanith et al, 2010).…”
Section: Eradication Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bulk milk testing by antibody ELISA can be used to estimate seroprevalence in the herd [13,58]. In France, three consecutive bulk milk antibody tests at 4 month intervals were used to classify as either infected (for follow-up testing for the presence of PI animals) or uninfected herds (clear of the virus) [35], while a single bulk milk antibody ELISA result was used to decide the need (or not) for further herd testing in Norway [77], Finland [62] and Lower Austria [63]. In non-milking (e.g., beef) herds, a serological ''spot test''-testing of a representative sample of animals-has been used as an alternative to bulk milk testing [47], with a high number of positive individuals, or a strong reaction to a pooled blood sample indicating a positive herd.…”
Section: Identification Of Herds Likely To Be Infectedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the Shetland Islands, full herd serology was carried out, with a single antibody positive animal resulting in a positive herd-level classification [72]. In some programs, where a herd returned a high herdlevel antibody result, antibody testing of samples from young stock (e.g., blood from weaned calves or milk from primiparous cows) was used to determine whether the infection was historic or recent, with antibodies in young cattle indicating recent infection [15,47,63,77].…”
Section: Identification Of Herds Likely To Be Infectedmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation