2001
DOI: 10.21236/ada389494
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Volumetric Representation and Manipulation of Geometric Models

Abstract: Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing inslrurtrans sea^"« *^™"?Av, ",«.,. coltection gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of informal™. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES)Georgia Tech Research Corporation Georgia Institute of Technology Atlanta GA 30332-0420 SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES)Office of Naval Research, Ballston Centre … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To assess the proposed algorithm’s efficiency in handling a substantial amount of point cloud data, a model called Armadillo (Turk and Mullins, 2021) and its scanned point cloud are used. The original Armadillo point cloud is down-sampled, and the proposed method is implemented for varying numbers of points: 519, 1,038, 5,189, 10,378 and 20,756.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To assess the proposed algorithm’s efficiency in handling a substantial amount of point cloud data, a model called Armadillo (Turk and Mullins, 2021) and its scanned point cloud are used. The original Armadillo point cloud is down-sampled, and the proposed method is implemented for varying numbers of points: 519, 1,038, 5,189, 10,378 and 20,756.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Four kinds of multiplate objects (second row of Figure 9: Longitudinal, Fixture, Clip1 and Clip2) are generated by CAD software from us, and three kinds of free-form models (first row of Figure 9: Bunny, Dragon and Buddha) from Turk and Mullins (2021) are chosen as test objects in the experiments, as shown in Figure 9. Note that synthetic point clouds are acquired from simulated scans of the corresponding objects.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1) The comparison with traditional registration methods-DO [42], RDO [11], BCPD [27], LSGCPD [28], and TEASER++ [29] on synthetic datasets (http://visionair.ge.imati.cnr/ (accessed on 25 October 2020)) [48] (in Figure 6a,b) to show the accuracy and robustness of GRDO. (2) The comparison with deep learning registration methods-FMR [18], Deep-RGM [19], RPMNet [20], and RGM [21] on the ModelNet40 datasets [49] (in Figure 6c,d), which involves the selection of a similar point cloud and parameter transfer, and aims to showcase the efficacy of SGRTmreg on the registration of multiple point cloud pairs.…”
Section: Experimentationmentioning
confidence: 99%