2015
DOI: 10.17973/mmsj.2015_10_201534
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Volumetric Compensation of Threeaxis Vertical Machining Centre

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
(1 reference statement)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The volumetric accuracy of the machine was verified for the calibration cycle (LTc1) and the verification cycle (LTc2) according to the procedure described in [5]. Intermediate rigid body type 3 (IRB3) was chosen as a kinematic model.…”
Section: Volumetric Accuracymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The volumetric accuracy of the machine was verified for the calibration cycle (LTc1) and the verification cycle (LTc2) according to the procedure described in [5]. Intermediate rigid body type 3 (IRB3) was chosen as a kinematic model.…”
Section: Volumetric Accuracymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These conditions can be considered stable for calibration measurements LTc1 (see Section 3.1). The principle of measuring and determining LaserTRACER positions (P1, P2, P3 and P4) is described in publications [4,5]. In the verification measurements, temperature change on the X-axis did not exceed 0.3 • C, 0.6 • C on the Y-axis and 1.0 • C on the Z-axis.…”
Section: Volumetric Accuracymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These errors, including spindle errors, are shown for the three-axis vertical milling machine in Figure 1. The kinematic chain of the three-axis machine tool presented below corresponds to W (Workpiece) -X-Y-Z-T (Tool) [8].…”
Section: Geometric Accuracymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the increased importance of integrating metrology systems to machine tools to online compensate volumetric errors of machine tools for improving machining efficiency and accuracy, Wang and Maropoulos [2] developed a real-time volumetric error compensation algorithm to improve the dynamic path accuracy of a machine tool using a laser tracker-assisted 3-axis positioning system. Holub et al [18] identified volumetric errors of a small three-axis vertical machining center using a laser interferometer, and ballbar tests were used to validate the volumetric error compensation results. Later, Holub et al [19] performed on-the-fly tracking experiments on the small three-axis machining center to measure the volumetric errors of the small three-axis machining center using a self-tracking interferometer, and then compared the measurement time and results with conventional trigger-or time-based measurements to show the superior performance of on-the-fly measurement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%