2001
DOI: 10.1016/s1057-5219(01)00054-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Volume and autocovariance in short-horizon stock returns

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It should be noted that, although the theoretical models describe the volume-return relationship for individual securities, their implications have also been extensively tested on portfolio data, both using the resulting empirical model similar to our equation (7) on marketwide data (i.e. index returns and volume, e.g., Campbell et al, 1993, Gagnon andKarolyi, 2003) as well as returns and volume of portfolios from a contrarian strategy (Conrad et al, 1994, Coopers, 1999, Parisi and Acevedo, 2001, Gebka, 2005, Alsubaie and Najand, 2009. Similarly, the Sentana and Wadhwani (1992) model of feedback trading has been widely tested on index rather than individual securities" returns (e.g., , Bohl and Siklos, 2008.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted that, although the theoretical models describe the volume-return relationship for individual securities, their implications have also been extensively tested on portfolio data, both using the resulting empirical model similar to our equation (7) on marketwide data (i.e. index returns and volume, e.g., Campbell et al, 1993, Gagnon andKarolyi, 2003) as well as returns and volume of portfolios from a contrarian strategy (Conrad et al, 1994, Coopers, 1999, Parisi and Acevedo, 2001, Gebka, 2005, Alsubaie and Najand, 2009. Similarly, the Sentana and Wadhwani (1992) model of feedback trading has been widely tested on index rather than individual securities" returns (e.g., , Bohl and Siklos, 2008.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In support, several studies (e.g., Conrad, Hameed and Niden, 1994;Datar, Naik and Radcliffe, 1998;Chordia and Swaminathan, 2000) show that low-(high-)volume firms earn higher (lower) future returns. Along the same lines, Safvenblad (2000) and Parisi and Acevedo (2001) provide international evidence on this volume-based reversal effect, using data from the Swedish and the Chilean markets, respectively. On the other hand, Wang (1994) shows that large volume leads to positive return autocorrelation if speculation is the main motive for trading.…”
Section: Dynamic Endogeneitymentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Research on short-term autocorrelation, however, has been sparser. Short-term autocorrelation related to volume has been found in Malaysia (Hameed and Ting, 2000), Chile (Parisi and Acevedo, 2001), Taiwan (Shen and Wang, 1998), Turkey (Antoniou et al, 1997), and Sri Lanka (Elyasiani et al, 1996). However, these studies used variations of older methodologies from Conrad et al (1994) or earlier; some of the specifications of the inefficiency were sub-standard enough to raise concerns about data mining.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%