1955
DOI: 10.1021/ac60100a002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Voltammetry at Constant Current: Experimental Evaluation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
28
0
1

Year Published

1957
1957
1999
1999

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(4 reference statements)
1
28
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The circuit for chronopotentiometry was essentially that used by Reilley, Everett, and Johns (14) The electrolysis cell was a screw-cap sample bottle of approximately 100-ml. capacity.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The circuit for chronopotentiometry was essentially that used by Reilley, Everett, and Johns (14) The electrolysis cell was a screw-cap sample bottle of approximately 100-ml. capacity.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The potentialities as an analytical technique were pointed out by Reilley, Everett, and Johns (14). Xicholson and Karchmer obtained excellent results in routine determinations of lead ion (12).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent advances in digital hardware which permit more comprehensive data analysis and experimental control are being incorporated into chemical instrumentation. As hardware costs drop and expertise with these new devices increases, more sophisticated and "intelligent" microprocessors are appearing as integral parts of new instruments (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7). Such systems become increasingly capable of executing complex algorithms designed to extract analytically significant information from the output of the transducers.…”
Section: Nlc1dl1l2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It appeared to these authors that chronopotentiometry would develop into a highly sensitive analytical tool; Reilley (6) mentioned 5 X 10-j M as a probable lower attainable concentration limit. Since then, however, most electroanalytical chemists have taken a much dimmer view, seeing no advantage and many disadvantages to the method; see for example, Lingane ( 7 ) .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No kinetic parameters resulted from the work of Turner and Winkler (30) or from the few experiments made by Reilley and co-workers (31) in their evaluation of the constant current technique as an analytical tool. No kinetic parameters resulted from the work of Turner and Winkler (30) or from the few experiments made by Reilley and co-workers (31) in their evaluation of the constant current technique as an analytical tool.…”
Section: Present Investigationmentioning
confidence: 99%