1989
DOI: 10.1016/0013-4686(89)87094-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Voltammetric studies of the transpassive dissolution of mild steel in carbonate/bicarbonate solutions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The resulting passive layer Fe(OH) 2 vs FeCO 3 constituent ratio depends on whether HCO 3 À or hydroxide (OH À ) dominantly drives the charge transfer steps on which the growth of the corrosion products depend at higher potentials. [39] This mechanism is independent from O 2 traces in the media as reported by Rangel et al [40] Thus, comparability of present results with those of naturally aerated solutions in investigations such as [40][41][42] is sustained. Charge transfer steps of Fe(OH) 2 formation are thermodynamically viable in the E-pH range of 8.4 and 21 g L À1 NaHCO 3 in Figures 6(a) through (c), and 42 g L À1 NaHCO 3 in Figure 6(a) only: [36] Fe þ H 2 O !…”
Section: E P1 and E P2supporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The resulting passive layer Fe(OH) 2 vs FeCO 3 constituent ratio depends on whether HCO 3 À or hydroxide (OH À ) dominantly drives the charge transfer steps on which the growth of the corrosion products depend at higher potentials. [39] This mechanism is independent from O 2 traces in the media as reported by Rangel et al [40] Thus, comparability of present results with those of naturally aerated solutions in investigations such as [40][41][42] is sustained. Charge transfer steps of Fe(OH) 2 formation are thermodynamically viable in the E-pH range of 8.4 and 21 g L À1 NaHCO 3 in Figures 6(a) through (c), and 42 g L À1 NaHCO 3 in Figure 6(a) only: [36] Fe þ H 2 O !…”
Section: E P1 and E P2supporting
confidence: 87%
“…In Figures 6(a) and (b), decreasing i p values in this region with increasing [NaHCO 3 ] indicates the gradually enhancing protectiveness of FeCO 3 at higher anodic potentials, [40,44] plotted vs pH in Figure 8(a). The potential difference (DE) parameter, between the most anodic passive layer development potential (E p1 or E p2 ) and the earliest breakdown potential (E bd1 ), is plotted vs pH in Figure 8(b).…”
Section: E P1 and E P2mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Many investigations were carried out using highly alkaline solutions [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] or using buffer solutions as carbonate/bicarbonate [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26] or borate buffer [27][28][29][30][31][32] when a constant and not very high pH is desirable. Many products have been identified as resulting from the anodic polarization of iron at different potentials, by different surface analysis techniques [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]22,26,[33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also small changes in pH, particularly in the range of 12-13, can contribute to the appearance of peaks in the transpassive region which have been attributed to the oxidation of Fe(III) to Fe(VI) [19,20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Several authors [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26] have carried out cyclic voltammetric studies on iron and steel passivity in sodium and potassium alkaline media. The number of peaks shown on the recorded voltammograms is quite diverse.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%