2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ab.2013.12.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Voltammetric discrimination of mandelic acid enantiomers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
14
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further investigation of the modified electrodes was also performed by CV (Figure B). The bare GCE showed a typical reversible electrochemical response for the 5‐mM Fe(CN) 6 3−/4− redox couple at 224 mV with peak‐to‐peak potential difference (ΔE p ) of 112 mV . The GR‐modified GCE exhibited an increase in current, indicating the improved charge transfer due to the high surface area of GR nanosheets.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Further investigation of the modified electrodes was also performed by CV (Figure B). The bare GCE showed a typical reversible electrochemical response for the 5‐mM Fe(CN) 6 3−/4− redox couple at 224 mV with peak‐to‐peak potential difference (ΔE p ) of 112 mV . The GR‐modified GCE exhibited an increase in current, indicating the improved charge transfer due to the high surface area of GR nanosheets.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The bare GCE showed a typical reversible electrochemical response for the 5-mM Fe(CN) 6 3−/4− redox couple at 224 mV with peak-to-peak potential difference (ΔE p ) of 112 mV. 9 The GR-modified GCE exhibited an increase in current, indicating the improved charge transfer due to the high surface area of GR nanosheets. Furthermore, by modification of GR/GCE with OPPy-BMZ shows that the OPPy acted as an insulating layer and further proves previous investigations.…”
Section: Immobilization Of Oppy-bmz Film By Electrodeposition Methodsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…), the linear ranges were measured to be 0.02–5.0 mM and 0.04–10.0 mM, and the detection limits were 0.25 mM and 0.72 mM for S‐mandelic acid and R‐mandelic acid on the MIP‐Fe 3 O 4 @PNE NPs modified PDMS microchip, respectively. The results are better than those of voltammetric detection results and comparable to that of HPLC analysis . As can be seen in Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 50%