2019
DOI: 10.1007/s11829-019-09695-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Volatiles released by damaged leaves of Piper mollicomum (Piperaceae) act as cues for predaceous wasps: evidence using plasticine dummies as herbivore model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Terpene volatiles are also utilized by predators and parasitoids in prey location (Schnee et al, 2006; Vieira et al, 2019; Vuorinen et al, 2004) and may explain the predator abundance trends in our treatments. In the high‐frequency diculture, higher‐emitting commercial plants are separated by lower‐emitting reduced terpene plants, whereas in the low‐frequency diculture, higher‐emitting plants are more clumped.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Terpene volatiles are also utilized by predators and parasitoids in prey location (Schnee et al, 2006; Vieira et al, 2019; Vuorinen et al, 2004) and may explain the predator abundance trends in our treatments. In the high‐frequency diculture, higher‐emitting commercial plants are separated by lower‐emitting reduced terpene plants, whereas in the low‐frequency diculture, higher‐emitting plants are more clumped.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…maculiventris preferentially feeds on larger prey (DeClercq and Degheele 1994), so lower average pupal masses may indicate contexts in which predators were foraging more successfully. The altered terpene chemotype releases a lower abundance of sesquiterpenes than the commercial, and terpenes are often used by natural enemies to locate prey (Vuorinen et al 2004, Schnee et al 2006, Vieira et al 2019). Locating prey might be more difficult in an odor environment where different plants are signaling different information about herbivore presence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second most common type of impression was paired marks, which were observed when the models were exposed to carabids, formicids, anisolabidids, and labidurids. This result is consistent with previous studies in which paired marks were associated with chewing marks produced by predaceous arthropods (Howe et al, 2009; Greenop et al, 2019; Vieira et al, 2019). Impressions such as pricks and dents were associated with multiple predators; however, it is unclear whether these marks can be reliably used to identify specific arthropod groups in field conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%