2021
DOI: 10.1109/access.2021.3082565
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Voice Pathology Detection and Classification by Adopting Online Sequential Extreme Learning Machine

Abstract: In the last decade, the implementation of machine learning algorithms in the analysis of voice disorder is paramount in order to provide a non-invasive voice pathology detection by only using audio signal. In spite of that, most recent systems of voice pathology work on a limited acoustic database. In other words, the systems use one vowel, such as /a/, and ignore sentences and other vowels when analyzing the audio signal. Other key issues that should be considered in the systems are accuracy and time consumpt… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The evaluation measurements have been used in order to evaluate the proposed GWO-ELM approach regarding True Positive (TP), True Negative (TN), False Positive (FP), False Negative (FN), recall, accuracy, specificity, G-mean, precision, F-measure, and MCC. Equations (11–17) ( 44 46 ) depict these evaluation measurements.…”
Section: Experiments and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The evaluation measurements have been used in order to evaluate the proposed GWO-ELM approach regarding True Positive (TP), True Negative (TN), False Positive (FP), False Negative (FN), recall, accuracy, specificity, G-mean, precision, F-measure, and MCC. Equations (11–17) ( 44 46 ) depict these evaluation measurements.…”
Section: Experiments and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These measurements are accuracy, specificity, precision, recall (sensitivity), f-measure, G-mean, and execution time (sec). These evaluation measures have computed as shown in ( 3)-( 8) [34]- [36]. Where: TP denotes to true positive, TN denotes to true negative, FP and FN refer to false positive and false negative, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This section evaluated the performance of our proposed O-LAR mechanism against the existing LAR, D-LAR, and LEPR schemes using simulated experiments. The simulations of the proposed and existing routing protocols were conducted for different scenarios with varying number of UAVs and their speed through the NS-2.35 simulator [38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45].At the beginning of FANET scenario, all UAVs (05-25) are randomly distributed in the area of 1×1km 2 with a transmission range of each UAV is maximum as 250m and used IEEE 802.11g as a mac layer wireless standard. The speed of each UAV is varying from 20 to 100m/sec.…”
Section: Simulation Setup and Results Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%