2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2017.03.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Voice Handicap Index and Interpretation of the Cutoff Points Using Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve as Screening for Young Adult Female Smokers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many previous studies have shown that smoking is a causal factor changing voice and increasing the prevalence of voice disorders 4,5,9,10 . However, there are studies indicating that smoking does not affect the voice 19 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Many previous studies have shown that smoking is a causal factor changing voice and increasing the prevalence of voice disorders 4,5,9,10 . However, there are studies indicating that smoking does not affect the voice 19 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was also confirmed that persisted smoking could cause a vocal cord disease such as laryngitis, Rheinke's edema, and leukoplakia 1 . It was also found that smokers have a risk of various cancers such as oral cancer, pharyngeal cancer, and laryngeal cancer than non-smokers 1,4 .Secondly, smoking is known to change voice characteristics [8][9][10][11] . Smoking induces acoustical changes such as fundamental frequency, jitter, shimmer, and NHR, which determines the quality of voice 12-14 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…11 Furthermore, the VHI-30 can be used to predict the occurrence of voice disorders in nonsymptomatic high-risk populations, such as smokers and professional voice users. 12,13 Other scales to assess voice disorders have been found to correlate with the VHI-30. 14,15 In 2004, a simplified 10-item version of the VHI (VHI-10) was developed; this version was found to be less time-consuming, easier to administer in a clinical setting and statistically more robust than the full scale.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, is interestingly enough that the above studies computed only cut-off points for VHI-T and not for the rest of its domain (VHI-F, VHI-P, VHI-E) which has a good diagnostic value as it was underlined in former studies [52] [53]. Additionally, to the above, only Karlsen et al [29] underlined that VHI-F seemed to score accurately as a diagnostic discrimination between dysphonic and non-dysphonic condition in their study and this result is in agreement to this research.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%