2019
DOI: 10.1111/ibi.12728
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vocal activity rate index: a useful method to infer terrestrial bird abundance with acoustic monitoring

Abstract: Autonomous recording units have been widely used in a large number of bird studies in recent years, but challenges remain in estimating abundance based on acoustic monitoring. We tested whether vocal activity rate index (VAR; the number of songs per unit time for a species), recorded using autonomous recording units, was related to population abundance in two terrestrial bird species, the European Bee‐eater Merops apiaster and the Dupont's Lark Chersophilus duponti. We took recordings at sites where censuses w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
31
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(64 reference statements)
0
31
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of automated recorders has revolutionized the way we understand soundscapes and the way we monitor vocally active wildlife species (see review in Sugai, Silva, Ribeiro, & Llusia, ). Automated recorders can be used to detect species’ presence, monitor wildlife abundance (Pérez‐Granados, Bota, et al, ; Terry, Peake, & McGregor, ) and detect changes at community and landscape level (Burivalova et al, ; Pijanowski, Farina, Gage, Dumyahn, & Krause, ). That transformation has produced remarkable results for monitoring secretive species and for those that are active under challenging circumstances, such as at night and at sites that are inhospitable or difficult to access, such as forests or wetlands (Celis‐Murillo, Deppe, & Ward, ; Deichmann et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of automated recorders has revolutionized the way we understand soundscapes and the way we monitor vocally active wildlife species (see review in Sugai, Silva, Ribeiro, & Llusia, ). Automated recorders can be used to detect species’ presence, monitor wildlife abundance (Pérez‐Granados, Bota, et al, ; Terry, Peake, & McGregor, ) and detect changes at community and landscape level (Burivalova et al, ; Pijanowski, Farina, Gage, Dumyahn, & Krause, ). That transformation has produced remarkable results for monitoring secretive species and for those that are active under challenging circumstances, such as at night and at sites that are inhospitable or difficult to access, such as forests or wetlands (Celis‐Murillo, Deppe, & Ward, ; Deichmann et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among them, Pérez‐Granados et al. () found that the species‐specific recognizer used in our study detected only 63% of the songs of Dupont's Larks in a recording. Therefore, transient males singing at low rates in our study may not have been detected by acoustic monitoring.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…3 ). Low-quality microphone recordings can also be used together with high-quality recordings when accounting explicitly for the different detectabilities (e.g., with occupancy modeling approaches), or for the relationship between vocal activity rate and bird abundance ( Pérez-Granados et al, 2019a ; Pérez-Granados et al, 2019b ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, in ecoacoustics, little attention has been paid to the microphone specifications. Some studies have evaluated the effectiveness of different recorder types for birds ( Rempel et al, 2013 ; Pérez-Granados et al, 2019a ; Pérez-Granados et al, 2019b ) and bats ( Adams et al, 2012 ), and it has been reported that a recording system with the lowest SNR detected the least birds ( Rempel et al, 2013 ). Finally, Bardeli et al (2010) mentioned that automated detection of animal sounds could be impeded by worn microphones.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%