High microphone signal-to-noise ratio enhances acoustic sampling of wildlife

Abstract

Background Automated sound recorders are a popular sampling tool in ecology. However, the microphones themselves received little attention so far, and specifications that determine the recordings’ sound quality are seldom mentioned. Here, we demonstrate the importance of microphone signal-to-noise ratio for sampling sonant animals. Methods We tested 12 different microphone models in the field and measured their signal-to-noise ratios and detection ranges. We also measured the vocalisation activity of birds and bats that they recorded, the bird species richness, the bat call types richness, as well as the performance of automated detection of bird and bat calls. We tested the relationship of each one of these measures with signal-to-noise ratio in statistical models. Results Microphone signal-to-noise ratio positively affects the sound detection space areas, which increased by a factor of 1.7 for audible sound, and 10 for ultrasound, from the lowest to the highest signal-to-noise ratio microphone. Consequently, the sampled vocalisation activity increased by a factor of 1.6 for birds, and 9.7 for bats. Correspondingly, the species pool of birds and bats could not be completely detected by the microphones with lower signal-to-noise ratio. The performance of automated detection of bird and bat calls, as measured by its precision and recall, increased significantly with microphone signal-to-noise ratio. Discussion Microphone signal-to-noise ratio is a crucial characteristic of a sound recording system, positively affecting the acoustic sampling performance of birds and bats. It should be maximised by choosing appropriate microphones, and be quantified independently, especially in the ultrasound range.

A wave-confining metasphere beamforming acoustic sensor for superior human-machine voice interaction

“…Compared with triboelectric auditory sensors, which are the only type of acoustic sensors showing a higher sensitivity than the MBAS ( 9 , 36 ), the MBAS shows a superior SNR owing to the low self-noise of piezoelectric materials. Therefore, we achieve a combination of ultrahigh sensitivity and outstanding SNR due to the wave-confining capability and the low intrinsic noise of the MBAS, leading to a unique advantage in sound transduction comparing to all other types of acoustic sensors ( 38 ). The region of desired specification can show this conclusion in a joint SNR-sensitivity plot in Fig.…”

Addressing Power Issues in Biologging: An Audio/Inertial Recorder Case Study

“…SOLO is an open-source architecture based on low-cost embedded computer [ 11 ]. As a more generic approach to recording, it is highly configurable and is an appealing solution for researcher [ 20 , 21 , 22 ], but its power consumption is rather high. On a more high-end level, both Wildlife Acoustics with their Song-Meter product range [ 23 ], and Frontier Labs with the BAR-LT device [ 24 ] make high-quality field audio recording solutions available.…”

Automated classification of avian vocal activity using acoustic indices in regional and heterogeneous datasets

“…Our use of breakpoint regression identifies the number of samples required before diminishing returns on clas- Metcalf et al, 2020). Finally, if combining data from more than one type of recording unit, we recommend accounting for this using additional predictor variables as systematic differences in technology such as signal-to-noise ratio can influence recording quality (Darras et al, 2020).…”