2014
DOI: 10.5406/janimalethics.4.2.0030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vivisection, Virtue Ethics, and the Law in 19th-Century Britain

Abstract: This historical study of early 19th-century opposition to vivisection suggests that the moral persona of the vivisector was an important theme. Vivisectors claimed they deliberately suppressed their feelings to perform scientifically necessary experiments: Where there was reason, there could be no cruelty. Their critics argued they were callous and indifferent to suffering, which was problematic for medical practitioners, who were expected to be merciful and compassionate. This anthropocentric debate can be lo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is also historical precedent for similar actions in healthcare. For example, in early 19th century Britain, doctors who performed vivisection were subject to boycotts out of fear that they lacked sensitivity and compassion [ 63 ].…”
Section: Ethical Health Consumerismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is also historical precedent for similar actions in healthcare. For example, in early 19th century Britain, doctors who performed vivisection were subject to boycotts out of fear that they lacked sensitivity and compassion [ 63 ].…”
Section: Ethical Health Consumerismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…34 I have argued elsewhere that the ideal of gentlemanly medical conduct was, in modern terms, an expression of virtue ethics, a system first described in Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics and distinguished by its focus on motives and character rather than actions. 35 In the eighteenth century, in what has been termed 'the decline of virtue', character-based ethics began to lose ground to utilitarianism and deontology, but medicine still retained an old-fashioned attachment to the virtues and a strong emphasis on the good character of its practitioners. 36 For example, in the Fortnightly Review of (1882), the physician William Benjamin Carpenter (1813-1885) wrote that the morality of a pain-giving act lay not in the act itself (deontological ethics), nor in its result (utilitarianism), but in the motive for the act, a test that was also applied to vivisection.…”
Section: The Character Of the Vivisectormentioning
confidence: 99%