2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2012.11.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vitamin D3 supplementation, low-risk prostate cancer, and health disparities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More than half of the study subjects remained stable or improved with supplementation, compared to a fifth of the control group who did not receive supplementation (p = 0.025). Conversely, vitamin D3 supplementation did not benefit 40% of the subjects in this open-label clinical trial [28]. Another study involves the randomization of 37 patients with histologically proven adenocarcinoma of the prostate who had selected prostatectomy as primary therapy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…More than half of the study subjects remained stable or improved with supplementation, compared to a fifth of the control group who did not receive supplementation (p = 0.025). Conversely, vitamin D3 supplementation did not benefit 40% of the subjects in this open-label clinical trial [28]. Another study involves the randomization of 37 patients with histologically proven adenocarcinoma of the prostate who had selected prostatectomy as primary therapy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Therefore, the effect of local synthesis of 1,25(OH)D3 in the prostate might not be captured in epidemiological studies based on circulating levels of vitamin D. This phenomenon might help to explain the heterogeneous conclusions in other studies exploring the relationship between vitamin D with prostate cancer [23]–[27]. Whilst there is lack of conclusive evidence on the benefit of vitamin D supplementation in the development of prostate cancer, previous studies on the effect of pre-existing prostate cancer have so far produced ambiguous results [28], [29]. A research team in the United States explored the influence of vitamin D3 supplementation at 4000 IU daily for one year on the outcome of early stage, low-risk prostate cancer (Gleason score ≤6, prostate-specific antigen [PSA] ≤10, clinical stage T1c or T2a).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[12] In a study of early stage low risk prostate cancer patients given vitamin D3 4000 IU/d for one year, a decrease in the number of positive cores at repeat biopsy was observed in more than half of the participants without a change in PSA. [15]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All-cause mortality rates for men with prostate cancer are 25% to 40% lower for those with low compared with those with high serum 25(OH)D levels, whereas prostate cancer-specific mortality rates are about 10% to 20% higher for AA men than white American men (WA) after consideration of socioeconomic status, stage at diagnosis, and treatment (7). In addition, a vitamin D 3 supplementation study of patients on active surveillance with early-stage, low-risk prostate cancer found that among men given 4,000 IU/d of vitamin D 3 , half had fewer positive cores at repeat biopsy 1 year after enrollment in the study (8). The authors suggest that such vitamin D 3 supplementation could reduce prostate cancer-related health disparities in AA men.…”
Section: William B Grantmentioning
confidence: 99%