1941
DOI: 10.1001/archderm.1941.01490190148011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vitamin D Therapy in Dermatology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1941
1941
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other authors, however, reported equivocal or unimpressive results (Wright,3 Pascher and co-workers4 and Clarke5). …”
Section: San Franciscomentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Other authors, however, reported equivocal or unimpressive results (Wright,3 Pascher and co-workers4 and Clarke5). …”
Section: San Franciscomentioning
confidence: 93%
“…This type of experiment has been criticized on the grounds that, since the animals were allowed to consume the diets ad libitum and growth rate depends primarily on the caloric intake, the greater palatability of the diet containing the wholemeal, and not the higher nutritive value of its protein, was the factor responsible for the better performance of the rats eating it (Wright, 1941). Mitchell, Hamilton and Shields (1943), however, settled this point by showing that the weight increase of young rats on a diet of wholemeal bread was greater than that of littermates on a diet of white bread, whether the consumption of the former was limited to that of the latter, or whether both diets were freely consumed.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%