2012
DOI: 10.1097/mog.0b013e32835004dc
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vitamin D supplementation

Abstract: Difference in the recommendations from the US Institute of Medicine and the US Endocrine Society's Practice Guideline reflects different goals and views on current evidence. Significant gaps remain in the literature, and studies of vitamin D treatment assessing changes in outcomes at different 25(OH)D levels are needed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
39
0
7

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 130 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
39
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Since that time, vitamin D has been established as a major factor influencing metabolism of bones and calcium metabolism (1,2).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since that time, vitamin D has been established as a major factor influencing metabolism of bones and calcium metabolism (1,2).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Upon cellular uptake, retinol is converted to retinal by ubiquitous alcohol dehydrogenases, but further conversion to retinoic acid (RA), an active metabolite of vitamin A, requires specialized aldehyde dehydrogenases (ALDH1A). ALDH1A enzymes are expressed by a subset of cells, including gut dendritic cells and epithelial cells lining the upper and lower respiratory tracts (URT and LRT) (5,8). Once converted from retinal, RA in the form of all-trans-RA can be spontaneously isomerized to 9-cis-RA.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Individuals with low vitamin levels are particularly vulnerable to infections of the gastrointestinal and respiratory tracts (5)(6)(7)(8), the latter of which are responsible for one-fifth of all deaths among children under the age of five (1,9).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The controversy has been fuelled by several factors that should be taken into account in interpreting the results of the current literature. These include: the difficulty to distinguish the sole effect of vitamin D as the majority of intervention trials co-administered calcium; the difficulty to exactly measure the relative contribution of sunlight exposure, food fortification, and multivitamins intake; the lack of randomized controlled trials assessing the effect of vitamin D supplementation on health outcomes other than bone; and the complexity to compare studies utilizing different 25(OH)D assays (24,60,61,62,63). On the other hand, it should be emphasized that the two reports are intended for different populations (the general population for the IOM report and the population at risk for deficiency for the ES), and this could partly explain the controversy surrounding their respective recommendations.…”
Section: Vitamin D and The Search For A Thresholdmentioning
confidence: 99%