2011
DOI: 10.1684/pnv.2011.0288
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vitamin D in the elderly: 5 points to remember

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
85
1
8

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(97 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
85
1
8
Order By: Relevance
“…As already reported in the field of vitamin D research [1,3], the definition of 'lower' and 'higher' 25OHD status may vary depending on the study and population (for details, see Tables 2a and 2b), and was based either on threshold values defined a priori or on populationbased quantiles. When the same cognitive test was used in 3 or more studies, a summary measure of the mean difference with a 95% CI was calculated.…”
Section: Meta-analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…As already reported in the field of vitamin D research [1,3], the definition of 'lower' and 'higher' 25OHD status may vary depending on the study and population (for details, see Tables 2a and 2b), and was based either on threshold values defined a priori or on populationbased quantiles. When the same cognitive test was used in 3 or more studies, a summary measure of the mean difference with a 95% CI was calculated.…”
Section: Meta-analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, even if most cohorts included only older adults aged 65 years and older, some also tested middle-aged or even younger adults, with various proportions [20,22,24,25,27,28,34,36]. Age is known to increase the risks of both cognitive decline [18] and hypovitaminosis D [1][2][3]54]. It seems therefore crucial to focus on a homogeneous age group while assessing the neurological effects of vitamin D, especially since it has been suggested that the neuroprotective effects of vitamin D increase with the advance in age [4].…”
Section: Critical Analysis Of Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations