2013
DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1338171
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vitamin C Supplementation in Pregnancy—Does It Decrease Rates of Preterm Birth? A Systematic Review

Abstract: The available evidence supports no benefit gained from using vitamin C to prevent preterm birth. Evidence does not support limiting use of vitamin C supplementation for other indications.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In total, 124 records were excluded at full-text review, including a mismatch in populations in a single study (i.e., supplementing infants), three in intervention (dietary interventions not reported separately), three in comparator (compared dosages, thus supplement given to both intervention and control), 12, which did not report outcomes of interest (i.e., infant mortality), 19 in study design (i.e., observational studies, commentary) and 48 duplicates and older versions of Cochrane reviews ( Table S3 ). Nineteen umbrella reviews [ 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 ] were excluded and 19 reviews that did not report meta-analyses of RCTs (narrative syntheses only, meta-analysis of observational studies or combined observational and RCTs) (vitamin A [ 35 , 36 , 37 ], vitamin B6 and/or 12 [ 35 , 38 ], vitamin C and/or E [ 35 , 38 , 39 ], vitamin D and/or calcium [ 35 , 37 , 40 , 41 , 42 ], iron and/or folic acid [ 35 , 37 , 41 , 43 , 44 ], magnesium [ 35 , 37 ], zinc [ 45 , 46 , 47 ], MMN […”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In total, 124 records were excluded at full-text review, including a mismatch in populations in a single study (i.e., supplementing infants), three in intervention (dietary interventions not reported separately), three in comparator (compared dosages, thus supplement given to both intervention and control), 12, which did not report outcomes of interest (i.e., infant mortality), 19 in study design (i.e., observational studies, commentary) and 48 duplicates and older versions of Cochrane reviews ( Table S3 ). Nineteen umbrella reviews [ 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 ] were excluded and 19 reviews that did not report meta-analyses of RCTs (narrative syntheses only, meta-analysis of observational studies or combined observational and RCTs) (vitamin A [ 35 , 36 , 37 ], vitamin B6 and/or 12 [ 35 , 38 ], vitamin C and/or E [ 35 , 38 , 39 ], vitamin D and/or calcium [ 35 , 37 , 40 , 41 , 42 ], iron and/or folic acid [ 35 , 37 , 41 , 43 , 44 ], magnesium [ 35 , 37 ], zinc [ 45 , 46 , 47 ], MMN […”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 27 ] However, another study was of the contrary and does not support Vitamin C use for management or prevention of PPROM. [ 28 ]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, it is not clear how much ascorbate is really needed from diet and/or supplements to completely satisfy the requirement of TETs in the prevention of potential embryonic defects caused by inappropriate DNA demethylation. Due to the fact that ascorbate consumption from dietary sources is almost impossible to control quantitatively in human subjects, a recent review of 7 studies concluded that ascorbate supplementation does not exert obvious benefits to prevent preterm birth [138]. No significant difference was found in neonatal outcomes from the women supplemented with ascorbate in other studies [30].…”
Section: Epigenetic Regulation Of Ascorbate In Embryonic Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%