2021
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd013134.pub3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vitamin C supplementation for prevention and treatment of pneumonia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, we intend to summarise evidence relevant to patients who have a greater severity of pneumonia that warrants hospital admission. This is in contrast to recent reviews14 29 on vitamin C which have focused on prevention and treatment of pneumonia in general. Second, we attempt to include recent clinical trials that have been published recently resulting in an updated review.…”
Section: Ethics and Disseminationmentioning
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…First, we intend to summarise evidence relevant to patients who have a greater severity of pneumonia that warrants hospital admission. This is in contrast to recent reviews14 29 on vitamin C which have focused on prevention and treatment of pneumonia in general. Second, we attempt to include recent clinical trials that have been published recently resulting in an updated review.…”
Section: Ethics and Disseminationmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Previous randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the benefits of vitamin C supplementation among patients with pneumonia have yielded varied results. A systematic review 14 in 2021 included five RCTs of oral and parenteral vitamin C supplementation for prevention and treatment of pneumonia. This review found a reduction in the number of days before improvement in oxygen saturation (1.03±0.16 days vs 1.14 days±1.0 days) and respiratory rate (3.61±1.50 days vs 4.04±1.62 days) in the vitamin C-treated group compared with the control group, but the certainty of evidence was limited by the small number of trials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nine peer‐reviewed academic journal publications on pneumonia prevention were identified for inclusion in this review. Three were Cochrane reviews (Cao et al, 2022; Moberley et al, 2013; Padhani et al, 2021); one was an update of a previous Cochrane review (Schiffner‐Rohe et al, 2016); three were systematic reviews (Kraicer‐Melamed et al, 2016; Prina et al, 2015; Torres et al, 2013); one was a narrative review (Breen & File, 2015); and the final paper was a prospective multicentre cohort study (Hama et al, 2022). The geographical spread of the papers was wide and international.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, we found no associations between genetically predicted circulating iron, zinc, beta-carotene, vitamin B12, and vitamin C and the risk of gastrointestinal infections, pneumonia, or urinary tract infection. Systematic reviews of RCTs have found limited evidence of micronutrient supplementation on the risk of infections but have also underscored the paucity of studies [54][55][56][57]. Among those reviews, one reported no difference in the incidence of diarrhea and lower respiratory tract infection in infants with zinc supplementation [54].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among those reviews, one reported no difference in the incidence of diarrhea and lower respiratory tract infection in infants with zinc supplementation [54]. Another review found uncertain and limited evidence for vitamin C supplementation in preventing pneumonia [55]. Two reviews found no clear evidence that emerged in favor of selenium supplementation for developing infections [56] and the incidence of new infections [57] among critically ill patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%