2004
DOI: 10.1177/14746514040040060701
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vitamin B12 status of patients treated with metformin: a cross-sectional cohort study

Abstract: Aim To assess the vitamin B12 status of patients with type 2diabetes who had been receiving metformin treatment for at least one year. Methods Patients with type 2 diabetes attending a diabetes clinic were included in a cross-sectional cohort study. Patients exposed to metformin for more than one year (n=53) were compared with a non-exposed control group (n=31). Serum cobalamin and other variables reflecting vitamin B12 status were measured. Results Patients on metformin had lower cobalamin (289±137 vs. 3… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
14
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(20 reference statements)
0
14
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Varied prevalence of vitamin B12 deficiency in adult individuals with diabetes has been described by studies performed in different countries outside Africa [24, 6, 1113]. In comparison to the findings in our study, higher frequencies of vitamin B12 deficiency have been reported in U.S. and European studies.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 55%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Varied prevalence of vitamin B12 deficiency in adult individuals with diabetes has been described by studies performed in different countries outside Africa [24, 6, 1113]. In comparison to the findings in our study, higher frequencies of vitamin B12 deficiency have been reported in U.S. and European studies.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 55%
“…A cross sectional study by Pflipsen et al involving 203 outpatient type 2 diabetic patients at a large military primary care clinic in USA documented a prevalence of definite vitamin B12 deficiency of 22 % [2]. Similar studies done in Europe have reported prevalence of about 27 % [12, 13]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In two studies (3%), no inclusion or exclusion criteria were specified [29,30]. Thirteen studies (19%) limited inclusion of patients to lower risk patients (category A) by including only patients with less severe diabetes [20,26,27,31-33] or patients on monotherapy [19,24,27,33-36], or OAD-naïve patients [27,35] or by excluding high risk patients who failed previous therapy [37] or with multiple comorbidity [20,38,39]. Fifteen studies (22%) limited the inclusion to more complicated cases (category B), such as inadequately controlled by or not tolerating previous medication [40-45], receiving combination treatment [46-48] or insulin [21,23,45,49] or treated with maximum dose of medication [50].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fifteen studies (22%) limited the inclusion to more complicated cases (category B), such as inadequately controlled by or not tolerating previous medication [40-45], receiving combination treatment [46-48] or insulin [21,23,45,49] or treated with maximum dose of medication [50]. Furthermore, 18 studies (27%) excluded patients based on the presence at baseline of the outcome or a condition that could influence the outcome [18,24,25,33,37-39,47,51-55], non-availability of measurements and/or clinical visits [35,37,46,47,50,54,56,57], inability to fill in questionnaires (category C) [18,21,46,56]. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%