Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2006.04.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Visualizing three-dimensional root networks using computed tomography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
89
0
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
89
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…diameter of up to 200 μm; Watt et al (2008)). Furthermore, the material density range of plant roots is similar to those of the pore-water and organic matter fractions that constitute the surrounding soil (Kaestner et al 2006). Consequently, automated segmentation using standard computer vision algorithms is difficult to apply and does not yield reliable results (Coleman and Colbert 2007).…”
Section: D Image Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…diameter of up to 200 μm; Watt et al (2008)). Furthermore, the material density range of plant roots is similar to those of the pore-water and organic matter fractions that constitute the surrounding soil (Kaestner et al 2006). Consequently, automated segmentation using standard computer vision algorithms is difficult to apply and does not yield reliable results (Coleman and Colbert 2007).…”
Section: D Image Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Until recently, the majority of canonical methods for investigating roots in situ involve either root washing that results in a loss of root material and of spatially resolved data (Berntson and Woodward 1992;Dittmer 1938;Pagliai and De Nobili 1993;Sierra et al 2003;Smucker et al 1982) or rhizoboxes which constrain the observed root system to a 2D plane (Dinkelaker et al 1993;Gibeaut et al 1997;Schmidt et al 2011;Wenzel et al 2001). More recently, a number of studies have demonstrated the utility of X-ray-based, non-destructive tomographic imaging (μCT) for visualising undisturbed plant root systems in real soils (Aylmore 1993;Dunbabin et al 2013;Gregory and Hinsinger 1999;Gregory et al 2003;Heeraman et al 1997;Kaestner et al 2006;Perret et al 2007;Pierret et al 2005;Stuppy et al 2003). Increasingly, the imaging of plants at multiple time intervals is being incorporated into μCT studies, allowing longitudinal quantification of root trait development in relation to key soil parameters .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Digitized measurements can then be used in software to create 3D root system reconstructions [20][21][22]; in fractal branching modeling, which simulates the growth of root systems utilizing statistical relationships among root parts [12]; or for root-density based modeling [23]. Automatic methods have focused on in situ methods such as X-ray computed tomography (CT) scanning for small root systems [24] and ground-penetrating radar (GPR) for large root systems [25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Para detectar estruturas com tais dimensões, técnicas com maior resolução são necessárias, a exemplo dos métodos não invasivos para visualização e quantificação das raízes em 3D (Kaestner et al, 2006;Mairhofer et al, 2012).…”
Section: Resultsunclassified
“…Na realidade, o crescimento das raízes depende da estrutura do solo, porém a estruturação do solo também depende das raízes, e descobrir o limiar onde o ambiente do solo controla a distribuição espacial das raízes e como o crescimento da raiz modifica a estrutura do solo, é trabalho bem complexo (Kaestner et al, 2006).…”
unclassified