Proceedings of Visualization 1995 Conference
DOI: 10.1109/infvis.1995.528686
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Visualizing the non-visual: spatial analysis and interaction with information from text documents

Abstract: This paper describes an approach to IV that involves spatializing text content for enhanced visual browsing and analysis. The application arena is large text document corpora such as digital libraries, regulations andprocedures, archived reports, etc. The basic idea is that text content from these sources may be transformed to a spatial representation that preserves informational characteristics from the documents. The spatial representation may then be visually browsed and analyzed in ways that avoid language… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
252
0
6

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 404 publications
(258 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
252
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…This finesse is relied on heavily in keyword search systems, web search engines, and information visualization algorithms that utilize "similarity" metrics based on statistical properties of the text (e.g., frequency counts of different content words) to place documents in a visual space (e.g., Morse and Lewis, 1997;Wise, Thomas, Pennock, Lantrip, Pottier, Schur, and Crow, 1996). The primary limitation of this approach is that syntactic and statistical properties of text provide a weak correlate to semantics and domain content.…”
Section: Typical Finesses To the Context Sensitivity Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This finesse is relied on heavily in keyword search systems, web search engines, and information visualization algorithms that utilize "similarity" metrics based on statistical properties of the text (e.g., frequency counts of different content words) to place documents in a visual space (e.g., Morse and Lewis, 1997;Wise, Thomas, Pennock, Lantrip, Pottier, Schur, and Crow, 1996). The primary limitation of this approach is that syntactic and statistical properties of text provide a weak correlate to semantics and domain content.…”
Section: Typical Finesses To the Context Sensitivity Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Visualization is used on large textual data sets primarily to show overviews or patterns in the data (Wise et al, 1995;Chen et al, 1998;Eick, 1994). However, with the exception of showing similarities, there has not been much work on revealing relationships between categories of textual data.…”
Section: Visualizing Relationships In Categorical Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(d) syntactic finesse -use syntactic or statistical properties of text (e.g., word frequency counts) as cues to semantic content This finesse is relied on heavily in keyword search systems, web search engines, and information visualization algorithms that utilize "similarity" metrics based on statistical properties of the text (e.g., frequency counts of different content words) to place documents in a visual space (e.g., Morse and Lewis, 1997;Wise, Thomas, Pennock, Lantrip, Pottier, Schur, and Crow, 1996). The primary limitation of this approach is that syntactic and statistical properties of text provide a weak correlate to semantics and domain content.…”
Section: Typical "Finesses" To Data Overloadmentioning
confidence: 99%