Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Computational Approaches to Historical Language Change 2019
DOI: 10.18653/v1/w19-4734
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Visualizing Linguistic Change as Dimension Interactions

Abstract: Historical change typically is the result of complex interactions between several linguistic factors. Identifying the relevant factors and understanding how they interact across the temporal dimension is the core remit of historical linguistics. With respect to corpus work, this entails a separate annotation, extraction and painstaking pair-wise comparison of the relevant bits of information. This paper presents a significant extension of HistoBankVis, a multilayer visualization system which allows a fast and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 14 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…So that it can be seen how the existence of a nation's language is the pattern of its development from time to time, as a consideration in making decisions such as ideology, politics, socio-culture, defense, and security of a nation through alternative considerations including comparative historical studies of a language. Why not, because the study of Diachronic Linguistics of language kinship is seen as very important because it is suspected that in the last twenty years, language revitalization has become the main focus of study among linguists (Schätzle et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So that it can be seen how the existence of a nation's language is the pattern of its development from time to time, as a consideration in making decisions such as ideology, politics, socio-culture, defense, and security of a nation through alternative considerations including comparative historical studies of a language. Why not, because the study of Diachronic Linguistics of language kinship is seen as very important because it is suspected that in the last twenty years, language revitalization has become the main focus of study among linguists (Schätzle et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%