Abstract:This study draws on multimodal conversation analysis to emically account for moments in second language (L2) English interaction in which speakers appear to be visualizing text as they talk. One way they do this is by slotting out elements of a turn‐in‐progress in the air, shifting their hand in a slotting gesture from left to right as they say each word to display to their recipient that they are visualizing certain elements of the turn. In other cases, participants use their fingers to ‘write’ elements of th… Show more
“…Their study links with Greer and Nanbu's (2022, this issue) in that Hellermann and Thorne write of “interbodied” cooperative practices, which they characterize as synchronized or sequentially mirrored body‐to‐body practices. In this discussion, I have already stressed the importance of synchronization in complex systems and of interactional practices as the focus of the investigation.…”
Section: Discussion Of the Articlesmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Greer and Nanbu (2022, this issue) offer a fascinating account of gestures used by L2 speakers—not by studying iconic gestures, as is often the case, but rather by examining gestures that correspond with written forms of a turn‐in‐progress to make grammar a “shared object of visualization” (p. 70, this issue), as the authors say. I am grateful that Greer and Nanbu have gone beyond platitudes concerning multimodal interactional practices and have done the hard work of investigating them.…”
Section: Discussion Of the Articlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hall (2022, this issue) observes that teachers’ questions are prevalent in classroom instruction, yet little is known about the social action that they elicit. In her study, more etic than emic, 4 hours of video recordings in an English‐as‐an‐L2 class were examined for questions posed by the teacher.…”
The data-rich articles in this special issue invite readers to consider how grammar and multimodality enact social practices. In particular, they propose a reconceptualization of grammar, moving beyond an autonomous system of items and combinatorial rules to demonstrate how grammar is an embodied resource for social interaction. In this discussion, I build on this important reconceptualization of grammar in order to identify cross-cutting themes-themes that result from combining research methodologies and connecting the research reported on here with that originating from other disciplines, especially that inspired by complex dynamic systems theory. My intention is to urge all researchers not only to pursue their own research agendas but also to build on existing common ground, in order to overcome fractionalization and to contribute to our mutual understanding.
“…Their study links with Greer and Nanbu's (2022, this issue) in that Hellermann and Thorne write of “interbodied” cooperative practices, which they characterize as synchronized or sequentially mirrored body‐to‐body practices. In this discussion, I have already stressed the importance of synchronization in complex systems and of interactional practices as the focus of the investigation.…”
Section: Discussion Of the Articlesmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Greer and Nanbu (2022, this issue) offer a fascinating account of gestures used by L2 speakers—not by studying iconic gestures, as is often the case, but rather by examining gestures that correspond with written forms of a turn‐in‐progress to make grammar a “shared object of visualization” (p. 70, this issue), as the authors say. I am grateful that Greer and Nanbu have gone beyond platitudes concerning multimodal interactional practices and have done the hard work of investigating them.…”
Section: Discussion Of the Articlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hall (2022, this issue) observes that teachers’ questions are prevalent in classroom instruction, yet little is known about the social action that they elicit. In her study, more etic than emic, 4 hours of video recordings in an English‐as‐an‐L2 class were examined for questions posed by the teacher.…”
The data-rich articles in this special issue invite readers to consider how grammar and multimodality enact social practices. In particular, they propose a reconceptualization of grammar, moving beyond an autonomous system of items and combinatorial rules to demonstrate how grammar is an embodied resource for social interaction. In this discussion, I build on this important reconceptualization of grammar in order to identify cross-cutting themes-themes that result from combining research methodologies and connecting the research reported on here with that originating from other disciplines, especially that inspired by complex dynamic systems theory. My intention is to urge all researchers not only to pursue their own research agendas but also to build on existing common ground, in order to overcome fractionalization and to contribute to our mutual understanding.
“…Based on a corpus of video‐recorded paired discussion tests, Greer & Nanbu (2022, this issue) use multimodal CA to examine Japanese English‐as‐a‐foreign‐language learners’ use of writing gestures as they talk. They suggest that learners’ visualizing written grammar or words helps them to recall and/or produce linguistic items or structures and hence supports their social interaction with others.…”
Section: The Contributions To This Issuementioning
Setting the stage for the central themes and the articles in this special issue, this introduction delineates the epistemological confluences, complementarities, and differences among conversation analysis (CA), on the one hand, and 2 strands of usage-based linguistics, on the other-namely, usage-based secondlanguage acquisition (SLA) and interactional linguistics. This implies depicting how an increased interest in actual usage within the field of linguistics, including usage-based SLA, has converged with the basic assumptions in CA and interactional linguistics: (a) Language use is primordially and primarily situated in social interaction, and (b) language emerges out of social interaction. We scrutinize the grounds for combining the 3 frameworks for investigating second language development, illustrate such combination through the discussion of some of the rare existing studies that integrate these frameworks, and argue for the need to develop the methodological combinations further in order to move toward an ecologically more valid understanding of how language develops out of language use. On that basis, and additionally drawing on the individual contributions to the special issue, we then outline some implications for L2 education.
“…The study by Greer & Nanbu (2022, this issue) offers valuable insights into the grammar–body interface (Mushin & Pekarek Doehler, 2021) by examining interactional moments where L2 speakers of English whose first language is Japanese visualize text as they talk. Their data from paired discussion tests shows that the participants visualize elements of a turn‐in‐progress by embodied displays that depict these elements in the air or by writing such elements in the air or on the palms of their hands.…”
The articles in this special issue contribute to understanding the interactional grounding of language learning by scrutinizing how patterns of language use emerge and get routinized as dynamic resources for accomplishing actions in co-constructed interaction. Their findings problematize how grammar is represented in second language (L2) teaching materials and have important implications for future research and language pedagogy. In this commentary, we address some of these implications focusing on two questions: (a) how the studies change the conceptualization of grammar as an object of L2 learning and teaching, and (b) how the insights of this research can inform language teaching.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.