2015
DOI: 10.1080/17538947.2015.1111949
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Visualisation techniques to support public interpretation of future climate change and land-use choices: a case study from N-E Scotland

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This topic is therefore an example of an issue placed on the UKCCRA2017 'watch list'. For example, research methodologies are now investigating the role of landscape features in climate change risk perception [169] or using scenario visualization techniques to elicit diverse responses on landscape change [170,171].…”
Section: (J) Risks To Amenity Heritage and Charactermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This topic is therefore an example of an issue placed on the UKCCRA2017 'watch list'. For example, research methodologies are now investigating the role of landscape features in climate change risk perception [169] or using scenario visualization techniques to elicit diverse responses on landscape change [170,171].…”
Section: (J) Risks To Amenity Heritage and Charactermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead of bringing all experts together in a workshop, as previous studies do, our approach grouped experts in separated sectoral workshops, which makes it easier to develop a consistent set of Bsectoral^visions. Many of the participatory scenario exercises found in literature (Volkery et al 2008;Brown and Castellazzi 2014;Wang et al 2016) have used a range of methods and visualisation tools separately, but we combined and adapted them in an iterative process to get a greater co-creation and richness in the visions. The use of electronic canvas as visualisation tool facilitates the linking of qualitative stakeholder statements with quantitative model simulations and at the same time enhances the engagement and understanding of the modelling outcomes by stakeholders.…”
Section: Benefits and Weaknesses Of The Methodological Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the studies are at local or regional scales and do not cover all land-use sectors (Faysse et al 2014;Wang et al 2016). Compared to these previous exercises, our approach covers all Europe and is cross-sectoral.…”
Section: Benefits and Weaknesses Of The Methodological Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…permeable surfaces and associated greenspace) but these do not facilitate an interactive or immersive engagement with the proposed design features. In other contexts, innovative use of computer-based visualization and Virtual Reality (VR) technology has been shown to encourage greater engagement and awareness of landscape design challenges amongst diverse participants [11] [12], further highlighting our rationale for investigating its application in meeting the design challenges of sponge cities. Most notably, the additional realism of a 3D application may also help avoid misunderstandings that occur between the design teams and stakeholders when using 2D illustrations that typically leads to the need for re-design and reworking during the design phase.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%