2015
DOI: 10.1117/1.jei.24.2.023025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Visual tracking via robust multitask sparse prototypes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Frag [27], IVT [28], MIL [29], OAB [30], L1 [31], VTS [32], TLD [33], MTT [34], CT [35], VTD [36], Struck [37] and PartT [38]. All these trackers apply different representation or inference models.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Frag [27], IVT [28], MIL [29], OAB [30], L1 [31], VTS [32], TLD [33], MTT [34], CT [35], VTD [36], Struck [37] and PartT [38]. All these trackers apply different representation or inference models.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Mei et al [2], an efficient l 1 tracker with minimum error bound and occlusion detection is proposed. Zhang et al [14] investigate convex mixed norm l p,q (i.e. p ≥ 1, q ≥ 1) to enforce joint sparsity for the particles.…”
Section: Sparse Representation For Object Trackingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To explore these hidden structures, [14] employed multi task sparse learning to impose joint sparsity between the particles (tasks) yields a more accurate representation for the ensemble of particles where the sparse representation matrix X = [x 1 , . .…”
Section: Joint Sparse Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generative methods use appearance models to represent the target object and search for the most similar image regions to the generative model. Popular generative trackers include eigentracker [7], incremental tracker [26,23], sparse trackers [24,34,5], visual tracking decomposition [22], and so on. A drawback of these methods is that they are not designed to distinguish between target and background patches, and are prone to drift.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To design a robust tracking algorithm in spite of partial occlusion, researchers have developed sophisticated appearance models through statistical analysis [15], robust statistics [1,10], model analysis [12], learning occlusion with likelihoods [21], and sparse representation [24,35,34,5]. Among them, methods part-wisely modeling object appearance [1,13,9,27,18,29,25] become more popular partially because of their favorable property of robustness against partial occlusion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%