2014 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 2014
DOI: 10.1109/cvpr.2014.164
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Partial Occlusion Handling for Visual Tracking via Robust Part Matching

Abstract: Part-based visual tracking is advantageous due to its robustness against partial occlusion. However, how to effectively exploit the confidence scores of individual parts to construct a robust tracker is still a challenging problem. In this paper, we address this problem by simultaneously matching parts in each of multiple frames, which is realized by a locality-constrained low-rank sparse learning method that establishes multi-frame part correspondences through optimization of partial permutation matrices. The… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
58
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 115 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By forming the Lagrange function of (9) and taking its minimum with respect to the primal variables r, z, c g ∀g, we obtain its dual problem in (10), where g(u 0 , u g ) is the dual function expressed in (11) and (u 0 , u g ∀g ∈ G) are the dual variables corresponding to the primal equality and inequality constraints, respectively min u 0 ,u g ≥0∀g g(u 0 , u g ).…”
Section: Appendixmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…By forming the Lagrange function of (9) and taking its minimum with respect to the primal variables r, z, c g ∀g, we obtain its dual problem in (10), where g(u 0 , u g ) is the dual function expressed in (11) and (u 0 , u g ∀g ∈ G) are the dual variables corresponding to the primal equality and inequality constraints, respectively min u 0 ,u g ≥0∀g g(u 0 , u g ).…”
Section: Appendixmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, sparse representation has been successfully applied to visual tracking [1], [5]- [10]. In this case, the tracker represents each target candidate as a sparse linear combination of dictionary templates that can be dynamically updated to maintain an up-to-date target appearance model.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [37] , low-rank sparse learning is adopted to consider the correlations among particles for robust tracking. Part Matching Tracker (PMT) is developed for robust visual tracking in [31] , which realizes part matching among multiple frames by optimizing a partial permutation matrix for each frame, using locality-constrained low-rank and sparsity of matched parts as criteria. But, this method ignores the discriminative ability from its surrounding context information.…”
Section: Sparse Learning Based Trackersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…is the most representative work, and some extensions [5,[29][30][31][32] are developed to improve the l 1 tracker in terms of both speed and accuracy. In [29] , APG based solution is used to improve the l 1 tracker.…”
Section: Sparse Learning Based Trackersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the most challenging issues is the handling of inter-person occlusion, and it is one of the key aspects considered for tracking. Many reported methods [1]- [3] consider the changes in appearance during occlusion. Others [4] focus on solving the issue of missed targets by utilizing scene knowledge caused by occlusion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%